Showing posts with label rail. Show all posts
Showing posts with label rail. Show all posts

Sunday, September 17, 2023

Video Captures Amtrak Train Hitting SUV in Andover MA

 (SOURCES: https://www.necn.com/on-air/as-seen-on/video-captures-amtrak-train-hit-suv-in-andover/3050097/

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/us/bmw-struck-by-amtrak-train-in-andover-woman-injured/ar-AA1gP6KP

An SUV was struck by an Amtrak train Saturday in Andover, Massachusetts, injuring one woman -- and it was all caught on camera.

Andover police say they responded to the incident on Pearson Street at Railroad Street around 9:20 a.m. and found a BMW X1 with significant front-end damage.

One woman was taken to Lawrence General Hospital with minor injuries, police said.

Amtrak says no passengers or crew members on the train were injured.

Surveillance video from a business nearby captured the terrifying moments as the Amtrak train slammed into the front-end of the SUV. It appears to show the driver going over the tracks as the crossing arms start coming down. The driver then backs up and continues to back up further when the train then collides with the SUV.

According to police, the driver was stopped on the tracks waiting to enter the intersection when she saw the crossing lights turn on and the gates come down. Police say she panicked and tried to back up before the front of her car was struck by the oncoming train, causing her to spin around.

Neighbors who spoke to NBC10 Boston on Saturday night said while they didn't see the moment of impact, they did see the aftermath and were glad to hear that the driver wasn't seriously hurt.

"I heard the train honking. It does that sometimes but lately it seemed like it's been more frequently and then I saw some police cars go by, so that's when I looked out the window and saw that the car had hit where the signal goes down," one woman said. "The entire engine was exposed, everything, it was just kind of compressed... It looked pretty bad."

Back in July, investigators say an 85-year-old man was killed by an Amtrak train near the Andover station. Prosecutors say the pedestrian was waiting for a southbound train to pass before being hit by a train going north -- right after the southbound train cleared the intersection.

Authorities say Amtrak police are investigating what happened Saturday in this latest incident.

Saturday, September 10, 2022

New Push for Boston-to-Montreal Passenger Trains

(SOURCE: Wilson Ring, Holly Ramer, https://apnews.com/article/travel-boston-canada-d2600621dc5fa2ce2af2a3b7825a65b7)

PORTLAND, Maine (AP) — Rail advocates are dusting off a proposal for passenger train service between Montreal and Boston, riding a renewed interest in train travel to bolster a concept that has been around for more than a decade.

“It’s not a hard sell at all. A lot of people want this,” said Francois Rebello, a former national assembly member in Quebec and a consultant on the project.

Hundreds of travelers would ride a privately operated, overnight train each day if obstacles can be overcome to make the service a reality in coming years, according to a ridership study.

It wouldn’t be a high-speed affair. Promoters envision a different experience — a relaxed ride with a meal and sleep before arriving bright-eyed at the destination. The 14-hour ride would travel through Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, Vermont and Quebec.


The proposal comes against a backdrop of a rail revival, and more than $100 billion in railway infrastructure funding approved by Congress.

Maine State Sen. Richard Bennett, a Republican who lives in a district where the train would pass, said there’s much work to be done.

“I’m both excited and skeptical,” he said. “I certainly support the concept and I think it has a lot of promise. I think this can be done.”

But the proposal is in the early stages and the obstacles are many.

The track on the Canadian side of the border requires more than $100 million in upgrades and repairs. The track is in good shape through northern New England but the speed is limited to about 35 mph (56 kph) for a long stretch, and there’s little hope of securing additional funding to boost the speed.

Operators would have to negotiate agreements with several private owners of the rail — the Saint Lawrence and Atlantic, CSX and others — and there could be multiple crews required for the train. Then there’s the question of clearing customs with people coming and going at multiple train stops, and finding scarce equipment.

The idea for restoring Montreal-to-Boston passenger rail service for the first time since the 1960s has been bounced around for more than a decade, and several different rail routes have been floated over the years.

This time, the proposed route would follow Canadian Pacific Railway track from Montreal to Sherbrooke, Quebec, and then the St. Lawrence and Atlantic across Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine, where a CSX-owned rail passes through Old Orchard Beach, a popular Maine tourist destination for Canadians. The final stretch is operated by the Massachusetts Bay Transit Authority.

Carl Fowler, a member of the Vermont Rail Advisory Council, is a rail advocate who likes the idea of expanded passenger rail service. But he said people have to be realistic about the proposal’s challenges.

“There are a lot of loose ends to be resolved,” he said. 

Proponents have engaged with the Canadian Pacific Railway and the corporate parent of St. Lawrence and Atlantic, and the Canadian government already has considered investing in railway upgrades, Rebello said. Montreal real estate entrepreneur Nikolai Ray has signed on an investor.

About 60 rail advocates, legislators, tourism officials and others gathered recently in Coaticook, Quebec, to discuss the vision promoted by Montreal-based Fondation Trains De Nuit, or Night Train Foundation, and view a proposed map. Notably absent were state transportation officials from Maine, New Hampshire and Vermont.

But the project won’t start anytime soon. The most optimistic view is that the project would need at least two years to become a reality, he said. However, it could take longer to secure funding and rail agreements.

A motorist could get from Boston to Montreal twice as fast but rail advocates say riders would get there in style. People could have dinner, be entertained and sleep in a comfortable bed, proponents say. They’d also be spared the cost of a hotel fee, since they’d be sleeping and showering on the train, supporters said.

The project holds appeal both for older riders who are nostalgic about trains and a younger generation that’s less enthralled with cars, Rebello said.

Rail enthusiast Sarah LeBaron von Baeyer, who lives outside Boston and doesn’t drive, said she “wholeheartedly” embraces mass transit that would allow her to visit family and friends in Canada several times a year.

“I love train travel. I lived in Japan for many years. It was absolutely the best way to get around,” she said.

Saturday, July 30, 2022

Federal Transit Administration Issues Directives to MBTA / Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities to Correct Safety Issues

https://www.transit.dot.gov/about/news/federal-transit-administration-issues-directives-massachusetts-bay-transportation

https://www.transit.dot.gov/regulations-and-programs/safety/special-directives-massachusetts-bay-transportation-authority-and

Wednesday, June 15, 2022

WASHINGTON – To improve safety for the Greater Boston Area's rail transit system, the U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Transit Administration (FTA) today issued a series of special directives to the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority (MBTA) and the Massachusetts Department of Public Utilities (DPU), the state agency responsible for safety oversight of the MBTA's rail transit operations.

A special directive is an order from the Federal government that requires an FTA-regulated transit agency or oversight organization to take immediate action on safety issues within a specific period. The special directives being issued today—four of which are being issued to the MBTA and one to the DPU—are a result of the FTA's safety management inspection of the MBTA that began April 14, 2022, following several incidents that resulted in one fatality and several injuries to passengers and employees on MBTA’s transit rail systems. These special directives require the MBTA, the MBTA Board of Directors, and the DPU to work together to remedy safety concerns and improve the MBTA's safety culture.

"Safety is our number one priority and must be the primary focus for the MBTA and the DPU," said FTA Administrator Nuria Fernandez. "Every transit passenger deserves a safe ride. Every transit worker deserves a safe workplace. The MBTA must immediately take action to improve its safety procedures for its passengers and workers."

FTA underscores that transit riders in the Boston area should not interpret the special directives issued today as a reason to avoid the MBTA subway or light rail. Rather, FTA's actions provide system-wide measures to fix longstanding issues with the agency's overall safety program and culture.

The four special directives issued to the MBTA concern:

  • Operating Control Center staffing;
  • General safety operating procedures;
  • Delayed critical maintenance; and
  • Lapses in staff safety certifications.

Each directive includes specific timeframes – ranging from 24 hours to 35 days -- for the MBTA to provide responses and take actions.  

The directive to the DPU affirms the need for the agency to enforce the special directives to the MBTA and address outstanding safety issues from FTA's most recent audit of the DPU. The audit, conducted in October 2019, resulted in sixteen findings, of which seven remain open. Those findings concern:

  • hazard management;
  • accident investigations;
  • corrective action plans;
  • and rules compliance.

FTA will provide technical assistance both to the DPU to enhance its enforcement role, and to the MBTA to help address the agency's safety issues. 

FTA's actions direct the two agencies to adopt system-wide measures to fix longstanding issues with the MBTA’s overall safety program and safety culture, including involvement of the members of the MBTA’s Board of Directors, who are the ultimate decision-makers for the agency, along with leadership of the DPU.  

FTA issued the directives as part of its oversight role and to continue to ensure transit remains the safest mode of surface transportation. FTA's Public Transportation Safety Program regulation lays out the agency's authority and process for overseeing and supporting transit safety, including issuing special directives.


Amtrak Service Restored Between Burlington, Vt. & NYC

 (SOURCES:  https://www.necn.com/news/local/all-aboard-amtrak-service-restored-between-burlington-vermont-nyc/2794853/

https://media.amtrak.com/2022/07/amtrak-and-the-vermont-agency-of-transportation-announce-ticket-sales-for-the-newly-expanded-ethan-allen-express-service-in-burlington-vergennes-and-middlebury/

After nearly 70 years, Vermont’s most populous community once again has passenger rail service to and from New York City.

The newly-expanded Ethan Allen Express connects downtown Burlington and Penn Station.

Secretary Joe Flynn, who leads the Vermont Agency of Transportation, said restoring service took decades of prep work, and more than $115 million in corridor investments — using mostly federal funds.

"I think it makes Burlington more complete," Flynn said in an interview with NECN & NBC10 Boston. "I really do."

Amtrak’s CEO, Stephen Gardner, said he is seeing interest in rail travel rebound to near pre-pandemic levels.

Friday, February 4, 2022

Athearn / Roundhouse HO Pan Am EMD F7A Locomotives PAR1 & PAR2

Just announced, and due March of 2023, is the Athearn/Roundhouse HO scale Pan Am EMD F7A pair of locomotives, PAR1 and PAR2. 


  • 5-pole motor with precision-machined flywheels and multi-link drive train for trouble-free operation
  • All-wheel drive with precision gears for smooth and quiet operation
  • All-wheel electrical pickup provides reliable current flow
  • Heavy die-cast frame for greater traction and more pulling power
  • Clear plastic cab and/or portal windows
  • Single or dual headlight per prototype
  • Separately-applied horns
  • McHenry® operating scale knuckle couplers
  • DCC Ready 21 pin plug
  • Machined metal wheels with RP25 contours operate on all popular brand of track
  • Fully-assembled and ready-to-run out of the box
  • Painted and printed for realistic decoration
  • Highly-detailed, injection-molded body
  • Minimum radius: 18”
  • Recommended radius: 22”

Monday, January 17, 2022

Maine Potatoes Once Again Moving by Rail

(SOURCE: By Corey Bouchard https://www.wagmtv.com/2022/01/15/maine-potatoes-head-west-coast/)

Maine potato farmers had a banner year this past fall. They are now reaping the benefits by shipping to western States. Corey Bouchard takes a look at how they overcame a transportation issue to get their crop to market... ” Rail enables us to move a large quantity, although a longer transit time”... The Agricultural Bargaining Council worked with Maine Northern Railway and Union Pacific to bring Refrigerated rail car service to Lajoie Growers to transport the spuds... (READ)

Thursday, October 8, 2020

Rail Photography Can't Always Be Perfect... a Lesson For Flat-Landers & Super Picky Rail-Photo Websites

Rail Photography Can't Always Be Perfect... a Lesson For Flat-Landers & Super Picky Rail-Photo Websites
by Jonelle DeFelice

Some railfan photo sites are so picky, they will reject an image submission just because of a blade of grass in the "wrong" place. Or perhaps there's a tiny shadow on a locomotive's windshield.  Well, they seem to think all railfans live in a perfect world of straight rails, great lighting, lots of trains, and absolutely NOTHING to get in the way of a perfect photo.


This photo from Shirley MA during late September is to show what we in Massachusetts have to put up with: Odd sun angles & shadows, curvy tracks, lots of trees, power lines & poles, signs, auto traffic, you name it. And this is a relatively clean commuter track (for now). Get past Fitchburg and things change... they become even harder.  

"Perfect" photos are a lot harder to get in this neck of the woods than railfans in "the flat lands" can ever understand...

Oh, and the above photo is the best I could get as the train rounded the curve.  Point made?


Here is an uncropped shot from Westford Station (MA) on a sunny September day.  Despite the fact this ROW is just about IN the parking lot of a popular walking trail, most eastbound freights will look like this.  Try to grab an eastbound and you need to stand someplace "photogenic" but also SAFE.  Recent trackwork means lineside weeds are gone... for THIS season...


Another uncropped shot from the same location.  This image from a cloudy Autumn day would probably still get rejected because of the sky.  You may not know this, but skies are not always clear blue.  That pile of ties and rail?  Well, that isn't "perfect".  And those signals aren't lit... why not?


This is a westbound work train at  the same location 3/2020.  Better lighting... sorta of.  You can see it was a nice sunny day.  But there are parked cars, moving cars, dead weeds, and yes, odd lighting.  Nothing you can do about it either, unless you stand closer to the road crossing, then you have the gates to contend with and also you need to be safely away from the train itself.  

ZOOMS are your friend.  But I couldn't get nice, well lit shots of the consist.  Had I stood on the other side of the track, which is closer to the rails, I probably would have had shadows to contend with there as well and the angle would have been bad.  I also would have received nasty looks from the crew for being too close to the train.


Here is that crossing during August of 2018.  Yet again... POINT MADE.


Here is a rather rare shot of an MBTA welded rail train at Belmont MA.  No place to stand other than the station platforms.  From this side, you have good light but the angle is sharp.  Oh, and those ties, they may interest some but to make it onto some rail-photo sites you better just delete this one... 


Uncropped, unedited photo of the same train, same location, but to get the train into the shot, I needed to cross the track.  Now lighting stinks.


This Belmont photo is SUPER rare... Pan Am Railways detour freight EDNM 4/3/10.  Also uncropped, we have GREAT lighting on the locomotives BUT only for a split second... soon the shadows will ruin things and the train will be too close to me to get a nice broadside photo.  I couldn't stand further down the platform because the track has a tight curve.


In closing, here is a rather NICE photo... nice lighting, interesting subject... OH BUT WHAT are those things blocking the view at center-left??  Nature??

Welcome to freight railroading in Eastern Massachusetts...

Tuesday, February 2, 2016

New Rail Link to Maine Waterfront Could Revive Port

SOURCE:   ABC news Tom Bell/AP



Freight trains are rolling through New England carrying the first-ever shipping containers loaded on the Portland waterfront. The new train service is the product of years of planning and millions in public and private investment, with the goal of connecting this once-thriving port by rail with freight customers throughout North America.

State officials see the rail link as key to reviving the port, which was among the largest on the East Coast a century ago but had fallen in past decades to a near-dormant state, losing business to larger ports.

Stuck at the end of the nation's supply line, Maine has struggled with higher transportation bills, which make manufacturing less competitive and increase costs for consumers.

The LePage administration has been trying to change those dynamics, first in 2013 by luring Eimskip, an Icelandic shipping company, to carry containerized cargo between Portland and Europe, and then by expanding the Portland container terminal. The state spent $29 million in state and federal money to modernize the terminal and expand it by about 1,500 feet to reach the end of the rail line, which previously had only carried bulk cargo, like rolls of paper, to and from the port.

The opening of the rail link is an historic moment for the port, said Jack Humeniuk, vice president of the Portland Longshoremen's Benevolent Association, whose members loaded the containers onto flat rail cars. "We're not looking at Maine as being at the end of the transportation trail, but as the front door to a different part of the world."

The new facility allows containers to be moved between ships and trains, and also between trucks and trains.

Pan Am Railways began the service Friday, hauling Poland Springs bottled water packed in blue Eimskip containers. This is the first phase of a pilot project. Three days a week — Friday, Saturday and Sunday — a train carrying 15 containers of bottle water will travel to Ayer, Massachusetts. There, the containers will be put on trucks and delivered to nearby wholesale suppliers.

Until now, Maine companies that lack rail access had to truck containers to terminals in Ayer and Worcester, Massachusetts. It's generally cheaper to move heavier cargo by train than by truck, because more can be moved at one time with lower fuel costs and fewer workers.

Because Pan Am trains will carry containers delivered by both truck and by ship, it will have enough volume to support regular service to Portland, Humeniuk said.

Chop Hardenbergh, editor of Atlantic Northeast Rails & Ports, a trade publication, said he is skeptical the new terminal will be successful. He said he has seen others in Maine fail because there hasn't been enough demand to make the operations economical.

"The big unknown is what Eimskip can bring to this," he said. "Can Eimskip add enough volume so Pan Am will say it's worthwhile to run a train?"

Vermont Rail System Files Complaint Against Shelburne

... Selectboard member Toni Supple described the gating off of Railroad Lane as mean-spirited and small-minded. She expressed dismay that Vermont Rail System President David Wulfson, a Shelburne resident, could act like this toward his own community.

“The way it’s escalating, it’s not good,” Selectboard member Tim Pudvar said. “It’s not good for them. It’s not good for us.” ......

READ ARTICLE:  Vermont Rail System files complaint against Shelburne 

Sunday, December 27, 2015

CT Rail Fares to Rise in 2016


HARTFORD, Conn. (AP)  Connecticut rail commuters will be paying a little more for their trip in 2016.

The Department of Transportation says train fares on the New Haven Line and Shore Line East will increase one percent on Jan. 1. Monthly tickets on sale for January will reflect the new fares.


The increase stems from legislation that required passengers to help contribute toward the cost of the new M-8 rail cars being put into active service.

Additional one percent increases across all rail fare types, including weekly and monthly combined bus/rail tickets, are scheduled to also take place on Jan. 1, 2017 and 2018 under the legislation.

The increase applies to all tickets for travel to and from Connecticut. New Haven Line tickets for travel within New York State will not be affected.

Thursday, December 24, 2015

The Maine Eastern Railroad will cease all operations on December 31, 2015

According to the Maine Eastern RR website: 

The Maine Eastern Railroad will cease all operations on December 31, 2015. The Central Maine & Quebec Railway will assume operations of the Rockland Branch on January 1, 2016.
 
The Maine Eastern Railroad (reporting mark MERR) is a short line freight railroad that operates in coastal Maine between Brunswick and Rockland on the state-owned Rockland Branch rail line. The Maine Eastern is a business name of the Morristown & Erie Railway of New Jersey, which acquired operating rights for the Rockland Branch in November of 2003.

The Maine Eastern provides year-round freight service, serving customers such as Dragon Cement and Bath Iron Works and interchanging with Pan Am Railways in Brunswick.

The Maine Eastern also offers seasonal excursion service, sharing a platform with the Amtrak Downeaster in Brunswick.

Tuesday, November 3, 2015

MBTA to Install $451 million Technology to Prevent Train Crashes

(SOURCE: Nicole Dungca, The Boston Globe)

The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority plans to spend an estimated $451.3 million to install technology meant to prevent accidents such as the Amtrak derailment that killed eight people in Philadelphia in May.

The fiscal control board that oversees the agency on Monday voted 4-0 to approve the contract to install what’s known as “positive train control” on all commuter rail lines that don’t already have it. The technology is designed to automatically slow trains on certain stretches of track.

The project could mean weekend shutdowns for commuter rail lines starting in March 2017 and continuing into 2018. Officials said the shutdowns would accelerate installation and save money.
MBTA officials said they expect the project to be complete in 2020, making the agency among the last major railroads across the country to install the federally mandated technology.

The increased costs come as transit advocates are already worried about fare hikes and are urging that they be kept to a minimum.

MBTA officials made it clear Monday that the costs will become a burden for the agency. Gerald Polcari, chief procurement officer for the MBTA, called the federal law requiring it an “unfunded mandate.”

“Do we have the funds for this?” he said. “No.”

To fund the work, the MBTA plans to borrow federal money through programs meant to finance transportation projects. 
 
The law requiring the technology was passed in 2008, and it was thrust into the spotlight this year when an Amtrak train derailed while traveling too quickly over a curve, killing eight people and injuring about 200 others. The National Transportation Safety Board said that positive train control could have prevented the accident.

Under the 2008 law, transit agencies had to finish implementing the technology by 2015 — yet so many cash-strapped agencies were behind that Congress recently passed an extension.

Positive train control, which must be installed on trains, tracks, and signals, is not new to the MBTA. Amtrak installed the technology on the Northeast Corridor tracks that run from New Haven to Boston, which includes the MBTA’s Providence/Stoughton line, according to David Diaz, a vice president with LTK Engineering Services, a firm helping the MBTA with the project.

But the system has 12 other commuter lines operating without the new technology.

The installation contract represents $338.5 million of the overall $451.3 million cost. The T will also need an additional $112.9 million for consultant services; financial support to help Keolis, the commuter rail operator, with the project; MBTA staff support; and contingency costs.

The additional expenditure comes as the governor-appointed control board figures out ways to cut costs and increase revenue. The agency spends nearly $2 billion annually and recently estimated it would take about $7.3 billion to fully upgrade its trains, tracks, and other infrastructure.

To fund the positive train control work, the MBTA plans to borrow federal money through programs created to finance projects. One of those programs, the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act, would cover about a third of the costs. MBTA officials said they could look into a combination of loans, as well as using other internal funds.

The costs will continue to grow once the technology is installed. According to officials, Keolis would need to spend about $12 million a year to maintain the technology.

Asked whether the extra costs will affect Keolis’s contract, company spokeswoman Leslie Aun directed questions to the MBTA. Agency officials did not immediately comment.

State Representative William Straus of Mattapoisett, who is cochairman of the Legislature’s transportation committee, said the large cost of the project shows how much the MBTA is in need of substantial investment.

“I think it’s going to be a challenge for the administration to come up with a financing plan if they limit themselves to simply changing operations and looking for efficiencies,” he said. “They’re good things, but I don’t think it will find you the kind of money that the system needs.”

In December, the MBTA’s control board will lay out a plan for closing its deficit, which will include cost controls and possibly fare increases.

Such hikes have worried transit advocates, several of whom on Monday urged the fiscal control board to raise fares by no more than 5 percent. Rafael Mares, senior attorney for the Conservation Law Foundation, said he believes a state law allows the MBTA to increase fares by 5 percent every two years, at most.

But state transportation department lawyers and Transportation Secretary Stephanie Pollack note that the language of the law says the MBTA can increase fares only every two years or only at a rate of 5 percent annually. They believe that means the MBTA could hike fares by 10 percent every two years.
That interpretation is also supported by key legislators, including Straus.

“I don’t think there’s any indication whatsoever that that’s what they’re thinking of, but that’s the size of the ballpark,” Straus said.

Also on Monday, MBTA officials said they are hiring a company to find out why the agency spends about 1.7 times more on bus maintenance than the average spent by other large urban public transit systems.

Officials revealed the agency spent about $40.81 per hour on maintaining its 1,060 buses in 2013. That compares with an average of $24.32 for 71 other public transit agencies in urban areas, according to the National Transit Database’s 2013 figures.

The 2013 figures were the most current available.

The MBTA’s chief administrator, Brian Shortsleeve, called the differences between the agencies “stark” but said the MBTA is not yet ready to propose ways to drive down the costs.

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Pan Am Eyes Downtown Portsmouth NH for Unloading Propane Train

(SOURCE:  Union Leader)


PORTSMOUTH — City officials with safety concerns may try to derail a possible plan by Pan Am Railways to unload propane from rail cars along tracks in the heart of Portsmouth.

Details of the proposal are still being ironed out, but a top Pan Am Railways official confirmed Monday that Portsmouth is one of the sites the company is eyeing as it tries to meet the region’s growing demand for propane.


The area under consideration is located in a rail yard in the city’s downtown near the historic Old North Cemetery on Maplewood Avenue and Gary’s Beverages on Deer Street.

“Because of its location, it is a location that we’re looking at for potentially transloading propane,” said Cynthia Scarano, executive vice president of Pan Am Railways.


According to Scarano, the propane would arrive by rail, and would then be pumped into trucks from different propane companies that would transport it from the site.


Scarano said Pan Am, which owns the tracks, is still considering other sites as well for an offloading facility and hasn’t made a final decision.


City officials said they haven’t received any formal propane plan for downtown, but are aware of the possibility.


“If this were to occur, certainly there would be concerns and the city would take every action possible to protect residents. We plan on opposing this,” Deputy City Manager David Allen said Monday.


The possible propane plan comes as the city continues to appeal the Newington Planning Board’s decision to give Sea-3 the go-ahead to expand its propane storage terminal in Newington to accommodate rail deliveries. Trains to Newington travel through downton Portsmouth, and the city has fought Sea-3’s stalled expansion plan amid concerns about rail safety and increased risk of mishaps involving propane deliveries.


Jane Ferrini, a city staff attorney, said Pan Am would have to meet various local, state and federal regulations to move ahead with any off-loading plan in Portsmouth.


She said the offices of the state fire marshal and Gov. Maggie Hassan have also been made aware of the possibility.


While plans are still preliminary, Ferrini said the city “has explored various legal avenues” in the event Pan Am moves ahead.


The plan would not involve the installation of any holding tanks to store propane at the site, Scarano said.


“Safety is our No. 1 priority and we’ll make sure we follow all the regulations,” Scarano said.

The downtown site is a “primary” spot because “it’s a central location of where we need to get this propane delivered to,” she said.


When asked if the delays in Sea-3’s expansion prompted Pan Am’s plan, Scarano responded, “What’s behind it is the fact that propane use as far as rail shipment is up 35 percent and that’s just because it’s considered a clean fuel now.”


Scarano confirmed that Pan Am officials were asked to meet with the governor’s office and others about the plan, including energy directors around New England.


She said she’s not sure when the plan could move forward because it all depends on demand, but she insisted that it would be within the coming months.


If the area sees an early cold snap and demand spikes while supply is low, Scarano said the off-loading plan would be needed sooner rather than later.

PORTSMOUTH — City officials with safety concerns may try to derail a possible plan by Pan Am Railways to unload propane from rail cars along tracks in the heart of Portsmouth.

Details of the proposal are still being ironed out, but a top Pan Am Railways official confirmed Monday that Portsmouth is one of the sites the company is eyeing as it tries to meet the region’s growing demand for propane.

The area under consideration is located in a rail yard in the city’s downtown near the historic Old North Cemetery on Maplewood Avenue and Gary’s Beverages on Deer Street.

“Because of its location, it is a location that we’re looking at for potentially transloading propane,” said Cynthia Scarano, executive vice president of Pan Am Railways.

According to Scarano, the propane would arrive by rail, and would then be pumped into trucks from different propane companies that would transport it from the site.

Scarano said Pan Am, which owns the tracks, is still considering other sites as well for an offloading facility and hasn’t made a final decision.

City officials said they haven’t received any formal propane plan for downtown, but are aware of the possibility.

“If this were to occur, certainly there would be concerns and the city would take every action possible to protect residents. We plan on opposing this,” Deputy City Manager David Allen said Monday.

The possible propane plan comes as the city continues to appeal the Newington Planning Board’s decision to give Sea-3 the go-ahead to expand its propane storage terminal in Newington to accommodate rail deliveries. Trains to Newington travel through downton Portsmouth, and the city has fought Sea-3’s stalled expansion plan amid concerns about rail safety and increased risk of mishaps involving propane deliveries.

Jane Ferrini, a city staff attorney, said Pan Am would have to meet various local, state and federal regulations to move ahead with any off-loading plan in Portsmouth.

She said the offices of the state fire marshal and Gov. Maggie Hassan have also been made aware of the possibility.

While plans are still preliminary, Ferrini said the city “has explored various legal avenues” in the event Pan Am moves ahead.

The plan would not involve the installation of any holding tanks to store propane at the site, Scarano said.

“Safety is our No. 1 priority and we’ll make sure we follow all the regulations,” Scarano said.

The downtown site is a “primary” spot because “it’s a central location of where we need to get this propane delivered to,” she said.

When asked if the delays in Sea-3’s expansion prompted Pan Am’s plan, Scarano responded, “What’s behind it is the fact that propane use as far as rail shipment is up 35 percent and that’s just because it’s considered a clean fuel now.”

Scarano confirmed that Pan Am officials were asked to meet with the governor’s office and others about the plan, including energy directors around New England.

She said she’s not sure when the plan could move forward because it all depends on demand, but she insisted that it would be within the coming months.

If the area sees an early cold snap and demand spikes while supply is low, Scarano said the off-loading plan would be needed sooner rather than later. - See more at: http://www.unionleader.com/Pan_Am_eyes_downtown_Portsmouth_for_possible_propane_plan#sthash.1VNIbG4a.dpuf
PORTSMOUTH — City officials with safety concerns may try to derail a possible plan by Pan Am Railways to unload propane from rail cars along tracks in the heart of Portsmouth.

Details of the proposal are still being ironed out, but a top Pan Am Railways official confirmed Monday that Portsmouth is one of the sites the company is eyeing as it tries to meet the region’s growing demand for propane.

The area under consideration is located in a rail yard in the city’s downtown near the historic Old North Cemetery on Maplewood Avenue and Gary’s Beverages on Deer Street.

“Because of its location, it is a location that we’re looking at for potentially transloading propane,” said Cynthia Scarano, executive vice president of Pan Am Railways.

According to Scarano, the propane would arrive by rail, and would then be pumped into trucks from different propane companies that would transport it from the site.

Scarano said Pan Am, which owns the tracks, is still considering other sites as well for an offloading facility and hasn’t made a final decision.

City officials said they haven’t received any formal propane plan for downtown, but are aware of the possibility.

“If this were to occur, certainly there would be concerns and the city would take every action possible to protect residents. We plan on opposing this,” Deputy City Manager David Allen said Monday.

The possible propane plan comes as the city continues to appeal the Newington Planning Board’s decision to give Sea-3 the go-ahead to expand its propane storage terminal in Newington to accommodate rail deliveries. Trains to Newington travel through downton Portsmouth, and the city has fought Sea-3’s stalled expansion plan amid concerns about rail safety and increased risk of mishaps involving propane deliveries.

Jane Ferrini, a city staff attorney, said Pan Am would have to meet various local, state and federal regulations to move ahead with any off-loading plan in Portsmouth.

She said the offices of the state fire marshal and Gov. Maggie Hassan have also been made aware of the possibility.

While plans are still preliminary, Ferrini said the city “has explored various legal avenues” in the event Pan Am moves ahead.

The plan would not involve the installation of any holding tanks to store propane at the site, Scarano said.

“Safety is our No. 1 priority and we’ll make sure we follow all the regulations,” Scarano said.

The downtown site is a “primary” spot because “it’s a central location of where we need to get this propane delivered to,” she said.

When asked if the delays in Sea-3’s expansion prompted Pan Am’s plan, Scarano responded, “What’s behind it is the fact that propane use as far as rail shipment is up 35 percent and that’s just because it’s considered a clean fuel now.”

Scarano confirmed that Pan Am officials were asked to meet with the governor’s office and others about the plan, including energy directors around New England.

She said she’s not sure when the plan could move forward because it all depends on demand, but she insisted that it would be within the coming months.

If the area sees an early cold snap and demand spikes while supply is low, Scarano said the off-loading plan would be needed sooner rather than later. - See more at: http://www.unionleader.com/Pan_Am_eyes_downtown_Portsmouth_for_possible_propane_plan#sthash.1VNIbG4a.dpuf

Monday, August 10, 2015

Genesee & Wyoming to Buy Claremont Concord Short Line

(SOURCE:  Valley News - By John Lippman)

The Claremont Concord Railroad, one of the smallest railroad lines in the country, is getting hitched to one of the world’s biggest rail carriers. 

The Upper Valley short line that shuttles freight over the Connecticut River between White River Junction and West Lebanon and over a stretch of track in Claremont is being acquired by Genesee & Wyoming, the Dar ien, Conn.-based railroad giant that owns or leases 120 freight railroads around the world. 

Genesee & Wyoming’s subsidiary New England Central Railroad on Thursday filed a notice with the federal Surface Transportation Board that it had reached an asset purchase agreement with Claremont Concord Railroad to acquire the railroad’s line in Claremont and lease to operate over a state-owned line in West Lebanon. 

Michael Williams, a spokesman for Genesee & Wyoming, confirmed via email earlier that the company is buying the Claremont Concord Railroad, but declined to elaborate. 

“When we’ve met with customers and when the transaction is finalized, we’ll be in a position to comment further,” he wrote. 

Genesee & Wyoming’s New England Central Railroad is a regional freight carrier that operates a 394-mile rail line between New London, Conn., and the Vermont/Quebec border. Claremont and White River Junction are interchange points along the line. 

Christopher Freed, the owner of the Claremont Concord Railroad, did not respond last week to emails or phone calls for comment. Word had been circulating for more than a year among area rail industry workers and watchers that Freed had his railroad up for sale, although no definitive word surfaced until last month when New England Central Railroad informed the Surface Transportation Board in a filing that a notice had been posted in the workplaces of the Claremont Concord Railroad of NECR’s intent to buy the Upper Valley railroad and that “as a result of the transaction” two engineer-conductor jobs paying between $18.34 and $24.45 an hour were expected to be available to workers. 

Freed, who owns a Pennsylvania-based locomotive services company, acquired the Claremont Concord Railroad in 2002 from LaValley Building Supply, which in turn had bought the railroad from Pinsly Corp. in 1989, said Steven LaValley, comptroller at the New Hampshire-based construction materials supply firm. He said LaValley Building Supply stepped in to buy the struggling railroad, which it depended on to help convey large building materials to its Claremont store, when Pinsly threatened to abandon the line. Prior to Pinsly, the railroad was owned by the Boston & Maine line.

The Claremont Concord Railroad’s origins date back to the mid-19th century as a line to connect its two namesake cities. Over the following 100 years, the company passed through numerous mergers and consolidations before being absorbed by Boston & Maine. But as the Northern New England rail industry declined along with the region’s manufacturing, sections of the line began to be abandoned around 1960 until it had shrunk to its current remnants by the late 1980s. 

Claremont Concord Railroad’s customers include Rymes Propane & Oil and Twin State Sand & Gravel in West Lebanon, fertilizer wholesaler Beaudry Enterprises and LaValley Building Supply in Claremont, and New York State-based rock salt miner and distributor American Rock Salt, according to the company’s website. A sister company, Eagle Leaf Transload, also provides bulk transfer services between railcar and trucks for commodities such as salt, cement, fertilizer, pipes, rebar, structural steel and brick at Westboro Rail Yard in West Lebanon and Claremont Junction in Claremont. 

For example, Rymes uses the short line to haul propane tank cars from White River Junction, where it arrives on rail from suppliers around the country, to West Lebanon, said John Rymes, vice president of the company. He welcomed the sale since he ships propane on New England Central’s rail cars and “it means I’ll now be dealing with one company instead of two.” 

Warren “Bud” Ames, president and co-owner of Twin State Sand & Gravel, said he utilizes the Claremont Concord Railroad between November and March to bring 250 to 300 carloads a year of rock salt, which he sources in New York State, to his West Lebanon plant. And Steven LaValley said his company still contracts with Claremont Concord Railroad’s trains to transfer lumber and other supplies from the Claremont Junction rail yard to the LaValley outlet on Pleasant Street. 

“Railroads don’t play nice with each other,” Ames said about the frequently testy relations among carriers when it comes to negotiating and prioritizing movement of cars over tracks and between interchanges. “If it’s under one roof, they’ll play nice,” he said.

New England Central’s rationale for the takeover of the Claremont Concord Railroad was partially spelled out in its filing on Thursday, explaining “the acquisition will give NECR direct access to transload locations and other customers served by CCRR. Eliminating a carrier from the route should increase the efficiency of operations and benefit CCRR’s shippers.”

New England Central Railroad, added the company, “believes it will be able to use its greater resources to grow the business on the lines.”

As a tiny short line with only a handful of steady customers, the Claremont Concord Railroad is no longer as busy as it was in White River Junction’s glory days as a Northern New England rail hub. The company today has four operating train engines, according to Christopher Parker, executive director of the Vermont Rail Action Network, including a General Motors-made 1,750-horsepower GP9 and three 1,000-horsepower American Locomotive Co. “switch engines.” 

Parker estimates the value of the 1950s-era GP9 to be about $100,000 and the value of each of the ALC switch engines at between $10,000 and $60,000 “depending upon condition.” In addition, the company owns two 380-horsepower General Electric-made engines known as “forty-four tonners” that are meant to haul only a couple of cars, although Parker’s not sure they are still in operation. The railroad also owns the one mile length of track that runs from Claremont Junction east to the LaValley Building Supply store between Mulberry Street and Pleasant Street.

Genesee & Wyoming’s plan for the Claremont Concord is unknown beyond what it said in its filing. But White River Junction resident Kevin Burkholder, who first reported the news of the railroad’s sale on his Eastern Railroad News website in March, said that Genesee & Wyoming’s New England Central Railroad, in addition to the advantages in serving customers, could also have its eye on Claremont Concord Railroad’s locomotive repair shop at its Claremont site. He noted that at present New England Central Railroad either has to run trains down to its Palmer, Mass., substation or a facility in St. Albans, Vt., for quartely inspections.

“Strategically it gives New England Central access to shop facilities that otherwise would take a day to run trains up and back,” Burkholder noted, thereby saving the company valuable time and expense.

Burkholder said the advantage for New England Central to own the Claremont spur was clear given Concord Claremont Railroad’s ownership and control of its track in the city. But he said access to the tracks in White River Junction is potentially complicated because it is controlled by Burlington-based Vermont Rail System, a major carrier in the state that owns several regional lines and operates more than 350 miles of track. New England Central needs permission for use of Vermont Rail’s track in White River Junction, which puts the privately owned midsize railroad in an advantageous position in dealing with New England Central. Indeed, area rail industry watchers have long speculated that Vermont Rail System was the logical buyer for the White River Junction-West Lebanon portion of the short line.

Nonetheless, Parker, of Vermont Rail Action Network, observed that Claremont Concord Railroad “integrates nicely” with New England Central Railroad. The acquisition would “streamline operations” and there is a “substantial opportunity for at the terminals to transfer freight from rail to truck. ... Its proximity to the interstate in West Lebanon makes it an excellent property for freight growth and freight development.” 

The northern spur of the Claremont Concord Railroad — which is now owned by the state of New Hampshire — runs along 4.6 miles of track extending from White River Junction, over the Connecticut River into West Lebanon and then southwestward to parallel the Mascoma River before terminating between the river and Glen Road just short of the Miracle Mile shopping corridor. Earlier this year, the Claremont Concord Railroad was granted approval to discontinue nearly one mile of track in Lebanon that is to be rehabilitated as part of the city’s rail trail.

“From our experience (the Claremont Concord Railroad) really wasn’t profitable,” LaValley said. “If it is, it’s marginally so.” He estimated that the company’s total assets, including the locomotives, would be valued today at about $500,000, although LaValley said it could be higher depending on the property’s use potential. He said at the time LaValley Building Supply owned the Claremont Concord Railroad it had about 10 employees.

Sunday, August 2, 2015

Amtrak Downeaster in Recovery Mode After Dismal Year

(SOURCE:  Portland Press Herald, Tom Bell)


For the first time in four months, Downeaster trains returned to normal schedules Saturday, signaling what supporters hope will be a new era following the service’s dreadful performance over the past 15 months.

“The great New England passenger rail nightmare is over!” exclaimed TrainRiders/Northeast, a pro-rail citizen group, on its Facebook page.

A nightmare it was.

When the rail service’s books closed June 30, it reported an annual on-time performance of only 30 percent – less than half the Amtrak national average of 71 percent. In May, the Downeaster’s worst month, not a single train arrived on time. In June, fewer than 8 percent arrived on time. In addition, 13 percent of trains – 488 trains in all – never made it out of the station in fiscal year 2015 because their trips were canceled, mostly due to construction.

Two bridge repair projects in Massachusetts last spring and this year’s harsh winter caused numerous delays and cancellations, but most of the woes were due to a massive tie-replacement project that took months longer to complete than anticipated.

Passengers responded by finding other ways to travel. In all, the service had nearly 100,000 fewer riders than the 536,524 in the previous fiscal year, an 18.2 percent drop.

One former fan is Kristina Egan, who lives in Freeport and travels two to three days a week to Massachusetts.

Before the construction began, Egan rode the Downeaster all the time because she enjoys its smooth ride and roomy seats. But after missing several meetings in Massachusetts, she switched to the Concord Coach Lines bus.

“I can’t afford to miss an important meeting because I like the train better than the bus,” said Egan, who heads Transportation for Massachusetts, a group that advocates for transit funding.

Another is Anthony Zeli of Portland, a longtime fan of trains who now rides the Concord bus to Boston if he needs to get somewhere on time. The train, he said, is only suitable for a “lazy and enjoyable weekend trip.”

A CREDIBILITY PROBLEM
Winning back disgruntled rail passengers is now the goal for the Northern New England Passenger Rail Authority, which operates the Downeaster. Once touted as a national model for how regional rail lines should be operated, the service is in recovery mode. The rail authority plans to lure back passengers by stepping up its advertising efforts, which had been put on the shelf during the construction project, and launching promotional fares, such as a 25 percent discount for travel on the midday trains, which were the most disrupted by the construction.

In the end though, marketing specialists say, what matters to the public is performance.
Amtrak and the rail authority have a credibility problem, said Karen DeMitto of Portland, who depends on public transportation because she does not own a car.

She said Amtrak employees who staffed its toll-free line didn’t seem to know what was happening with the service whenever she called to ask if a train was running. She said rail authority officials, in communications with the public, consistently underestimated how long the construction project would last.

“It was always, ‘Maybe next week it will be fixed,’ ” she said. “I was trying to get to Brunswick for the last seven weeks. Every week they said next week might be better, but it wasn’t.”

Any time a transit agency is experiencing major problems, it needs to tell the public what the problems are, why they are occurring and when they will be fixed, said Kenneth Hitchner, a former spokesman for New Jersey Transit who now manages public relations for Creative Marketing Alliance, a firm in New Jersey.

“When you are selling a service, it’s always about managing expectations,” he said.

But the delays and cancellations are symptoms of a deeper problem, said Dennis Bailey, who owns a public relations firm in Portland. The entire Amtrak system is plagued with decaying infrastructure because of inadequate funding, said Bailey, who last year worked for a Brunswick group that opposed the rail authority’s plans to construct a layover facility in Brunswick.

“They are not going to spin their way out of it,” he said. “There are some real issues they are going to have to resolve to match their PR.”

SINGLE-TRACK BLUES
It wasn’t always like this. For years, the Downeaster was seen as a model for expanding rail service elsewhere in the country. Its customer satisfaction rates, ridership growth and on-time performance were regularly among the highest in the Amtrak system.

The Downeaster’s woes began in April 2014, when the Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority began to rehabilitate three railroad bridges spanning the Merrimack River in Haverhill, including a bridge the Downeaster uses.

Then, in May of that year, rail inspectors determined that harsh winter weather and heavy snow melt had destabilized the ground under about 27 noncontiguous miles of track, mostly between Portland and the New Hampshire border. Because the Downeaster operates on a single track, trains were canceled or delayed to give the crews time to make repairs.

Last winter’s harsh weather caused numerous delays and cancellations. In February, a southbound train was stranded in a remote area of North Berwick because of an engine problem. The train eventually arrived in Boston more than six hours late.

The weather delays were compounded by a project to replace 30,000 rail ties on the 78-mile line that Pan Am Railways owns between Portland and the New Hampshire-Massachusetts border. The rail authority bought the ties for $2.3 million, and Pan Am paid for the equipment and labor to install them.

Pan Am replaced 8,000 ties last year. This year, however, the “tie gang” – the Pan Am crew that removes the old ties and replaces them with new ones – didn’t begin work until late May. The project was delayed by a number of factors. Some heavy equipment Pan Am needed for the project was delivered late by the manufacturer. Amtrak tried to send heavy equipment to Maine, but the shipment was delayed by an Amtrak derailment on May 12 in Philadelphia.

Now that the tie-replacement project is finished, the rail authority plans to increase its marketing effort. It has $520,000 to spend, including $40,000 carried over from last year’s budget.

The authority plans to use television, print and search-engine advertising. The message will be the same as in recent years, which is to highlight the “high quality, high value” experience of the rider, said Natalie Bogart, marketing director of the rail authority.

She said the authority won’t be talking about how it will overcome its recent poor on-time performance because a large segment of the target audience never rode the train before or encountered a problem.

“There are a lot of people who have been disrupted,” she said, “but a lot of people didn’t know anything happened.”

Patricia Quinn, executive director of the rail authority, said she’s confident she can get those who have abandoned the train to give it another chance.

“We are going to be more reliable than we have been in a long time,” she said. “It will take some time, but we will have to earn that reputation back.”

Promotions are a nice gesture, but passengers will return if they trust the service, said Wayne Davis, who heads TrainRiders/Northeast, which successfully lobbied the state in the early 1990s to establish the train service.

“I think just delivering people on time is the most important thing we can do,” he said.
Egan, who now rides the bus to Massachusetts, said she will be looking at the service’s performance carefully before deciding to take the train again.

“I need to see a couple of weeks of close-to-perfect performance and an explanation of why all the delays happened over this past year and how they are not going to happen over the next year,” she said.