Showing posts with label commuter. Show all posts
Showing posts with label commuter. Show all posts

Monday, February 1, 2016

MBTA Works on Locomotive Woes




Even good news for the MBTA, it seems, comes with bad news. The latest example: The T's finally put into service 40 new commuter rail locomotives it bought for over $5.5 million apiece, replacing units that were in some cases nearly 40 years old.


But from July to December, they still had over 60 breakdowns. And according to new data first reported by Nicole Dungca in The Boston Globe Monday, failures with the new units accounted for nearly a third of all delayed trains from June through December. Two of the brand-new locomotives have even been sent back to Motive Power Inc. and its engine subcontractor, General Electric, for major repairs.


Massachusetts Transportation Secretary Stephanie Pollack, in an interview after Monday afternoon’s meeting of the MBTA Fiscal and Management Control Board, said she is not worried that the HSP46 locomotives are lemons.


“There's a reason why you buy locomotives with two year warranties, and it does take a certain amount of time to shake them down,’’ Pollack said. “We’re obviously seeing things that need to be fixed, and we fully intend to hold the manufacturer accountable for under the warranty.’’


MBTA General Manager Frank DePaola said that “we’re not completely pleased” with the units but agreed that problems are being fixed, some “operator error” issues with engineers and mechanics have been addressed, and they are proving to get more reliable.


In December, the most recent month with full statistics, the HSP46 units went on average 18,723 miles between failures, according to data provided by MBTA spokesman Joe Pesaturo. That was three to five times better than most of the other older units still in operation.


Kate Price of Wellesley, waiting for her afternoon train home, said she’s been enjoying reliable service this winter. “I take it every single day, and it’s been good so far, knock wood,’’ Price said. She never notices what kind of locomotive is pulling her train. “Not really, no. I just want it to get me there,’’ Price said.


The T first ordered the locomotives back in 2010 and many that arrived in Boston in 2014 were kept off the road for months while problems were worked out. The T boasted then the units would reduce emissions and save 36,500 gallons of diesel fuel annually compared to other units.


“You need to look at the overall performance of the fleet,’’ Pollack said. “While it is not where it needs to be, and we will get it better, and we will get anything fixed that is owed to us under warranty, as a fleet it is working better than the locomotives it replaced. There is no question about that.’’

Tuesday, November 3, 2015

MBTA to Install $451 million Technology to Prevent Train Crashes

(SOURCE: Nicole Dungca, The Boston Globe)

The Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority plans to spend an estimated $451.3 million to install technology meant to prevent accidents such as the Amtrak derailment that killed eight people in Philadelphia in May.

The fiscal control board that oversees the agency on Monday voted 4-0 to approve the contract to install what’s known as “positive train control” on all commuter rail lines that don’t already have it. The technology is designed to automatically slow trains on certain stretches of track.

The project could mean weekend shutdowns for commuter rail lines starting in March 2017 and continuing into 2018. Officials said the shutdowns would accelerate installation and save money.
MBTA officials said they expect the project to be complete in 2020, making the agency among the last major railroads across the country to install the federally mandated technology.

The increased costs come as transit advocates are already worried about fare hikes and are urging that they be kept to a minimum.

MBTA officials made it clear Monday that the costs will become a burden for the agency. Gerald Polcari, chief procurement officer for the MBTA, called the federal law requiring it an “unfunded mandate.”

“Do we have the funds for this?” he said. “No.”

To fund the work, the MBTA plans to borrow federal money through programs meant to finance transportation projects. 
 
The law requiring the technology was passed in 2008, and it was thrust into the spotlight this year when an Amtrak train derailed while traveling too quickly over a curve, killing eight people and injuring about 200 others. The National Transportation Safety Board said that positive train control could have prevented the accident.

Under the 2008 law, transit agencies had to finish implementing the technology by 2015 — yet so many cash-strapped agencies were behind that Congress recently passed an extension.

Positive train control, which must be installed on trains, tracks, and signals, is not new to the MBTA. Amtrak installed the technology on the Northeast Corridor tracks that run from New Haven to Boston, which includes the MBTA’s Providence/Stoughton line, according to David Diaz, a vice president with LTK Engineering Services, a firm helping the MBTA with the project.

But the system has 12 other commuter lines operating without the new technology.

The installation contract represents $338.5 million of the overall $451.3 million cost. The T will also need an additional $112.9 million for consultant services; financial support to help Keolis, the commuter rail operator, with the project; MBTA staff support; and contingency costs.

The additional expenditure comes as the governor-appointed control board figures out ways to cut costs and increase revenue. The agency spends nearly $2 billion annually and recently estimated it would take about $7.3 billion to fully upgrade its trains, tracks, and other infrastructure.

To fund the positive train control work, the MBTA plans to borrow federal money through programs created to finance projects. One of those programs, the Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act, would cover about a third of the costs. MBTA officials said they could look into a combination of loans, as well as using other internal funds.

The costs will continue to grow once the technology is installed. According to officials, Keolis would need to spend about $12 million a year to maintain the technology.

Asked whether the extra costs will affect Keolis’s contract, company spokeswoman Leslie Aun directed questions to the MBTA. Agency officials did not immediately comment.

State Representative William Straus of Mattapoisett, who is cochairman of the Legislature’s transportation committee, said the large cost of the project shows how much the MBTA is in need of substantial investment.

“I think it’s going to be a challenge for the administration to come up with a financing plan if they limit themselves to simply changing operations and looking for efficiencies,” he said. “They’re good things, but I don’t think it will find you the kind of money that the system needs.”

In December, the MBTA’s control board will lay out a plan for closing its deficit, which will include cost controls and possibly fare increases.

Such hikes have worried transit advocates, several of whom on Monday urged the fiscal control board to raise fares by no more than 5 percent. Rafael Mares, senior attorney for the Conservation Law Foundation, said he believes a state law allows the MBTA to increase fares by 5 percent every two years, at most.

But state transportation department lawyers and Transportation Secretary Stephanie Pollack note that the language of the law says the MBTA can increase fares only every two years or only at a rate of 5 percent annually. They believe that means the MBTA could hike fares by 10 percent every two years.
That interpretation is also supported by key legislators, including Straus.

“I don’t think there’s any indication whatsoever that that’s what they’re thinking of, but that’s the size of the ballpark,” Straus said.

Also on Monday, MBTA officials said they are hiring a company to find out why the agency spends about 1.7 times more on bus maintenance than the average spent by other large urban public transit systems.

Officials revealed the agency spent about $40.81 per hour on maintaining its 1,060 buses in 2013. That compares with an average of $24.32 for 71 other public transit agencies in urban areas, according to the National Transit Database’s 2013 figures.

The 2013 figures were the most current available.

The MBTA’s chief administrator, Brian Shortsleeve, called the differences between the agencies “stark” but said the MBTA is not yet ready to propose ways to drive down the costs.

Sunday, May 31, 2015

New Hampshire - Commuter Rail Service Alone 'does not create jobs'

(SOURCE:  Concord Monitor)

A commuter rail connecting Boston to Manchester probably wouldn’t create jobs on its own, according to a study released yesterday by the Josiah Bartlett Center for Public Policy.

The conservative-leaning center’s report flouted the notion that commuter rail is a tool to spur job creation and instead found that passenger rail can influence growth where already planned investments will happen.

The study strikes a different tone than the Capitol Corridor Rail Study released earlier this year, which was paid for with federal money and found that a commuter line with stops in Nashua and Manchester would bring thousands of new jobs to New Hampshire. Rail advocates are currently calling on the Senate to restore $4 million for commuter rail engineering and planning work that the House stripped from Gov. Maggie Hassan’s capital budget.

The study’s conclusions were based on an analysis of projects in California, Missouri and Pennsylvania, and the Amtrak Downeaster line that runs 10 times a day between Boston and Maine with stops in Exeter, Durham and Dover.

“I like seeing people who are worried and thinking New Hampshire needs more people who are employed, and it would be great if it would create jobs, but the track record kind of speaks for itself,” said Josh Elliott-Traficante, a policy analyst at the Bartlett Center.

Elliott-Traficante used U.S. Census Data from the three New Hampshire towns with stops on the Downeaster to look at job creation. Though the line isn’t technically a commuter rail, the study used it as a functional equivalent, offering multiple departures a day and running over a fairly short distance. Since the Downeaster began running in 2001, Exeter has lost about 300 jobs since the commuter rail started running, while Dover has gained about 1,000 jobs. The number of jobs in Durham remained the same.

The study also looked at the Coaster commuter rail line near San Diego, which is roughly the same length as the Manchester/Boston proposal and connects similarly sized cities. There were minor gains in value for some types of residential property, but commercial property values fell nearly 10 percent, the report said. 

“More or less, the studies we looked at came up with the answer that there are benefits to it in certain areas, but by and large it doesn’t really create jobs,” Elliott-Traficante said.

The Capitol Corridor Rail Study, released in February, said a Boston/Manchester line would draw 668,000 riders annually. It would also create 5,600 permanent jobs supporting 3,600 new residential units along the corridor by 2030, the study said. From then on, the expansion of passenger rail would create 1,700 new jobs every year, the study said.

“The New Hampshire Rail Transit Authority, the Greater Nashua and Manchester Chambers of Commerce, the hundreds of companies they represent and a growing bi-partisan coalition of elected officials believe that rail can play a key role in jumpstarting New Hampshire’s economy,” said Michael Izbicki, chairman of the New Hampshire Rail Transit Authority, in a statement. “The result of an extensive two-year study on the expansion of passenger rail service along the 73 mile NH Capitol Corridor conducted by globally recognized transportation experts support(s) those assertions.”

Rail alone isn’t the sole answer for solving the state’s economic woes, but it is a part of a system that could be a catalyst for growth, he said. 

“However a complete multimodal transportation network that includes passenger rail could serve as a catalyst to promote economic development and should not be dismissed outright because it requires public investment,” Izbicki said.

Wednesday, April 29, 2015

MBTA Operator Keolis Hit With $1.6 Million Fine

(SOURCE:  Boston Globe - By Nicole Dungca


The MBTA fined its commuter rail operator nearly $1.6 million for subpar service in January and February that left thousands of passengers stranded.

Under its contract with Keolis Commuter Services, the MBTA can issue up to $868,850 in penalties every month for late or dirty trains, and other shortcomings.

After a series of snowstorms stretching over several months crippled the transit system, the commuter rail operation took more than six weeks to recover. The company restored full service on March 30, weeks after the last major snowfall.

Keolis officials declined to comment on the fines.

Company officials had tried to invoke a provision in its contract that would have allowed the company to avoid penalties for late trains and other deficiencies because of “severe weather.” The company’s general manager at the time, Thomas Mulligan, wrote to the MBTA that four major snowstorms had made it impossible for the company to provide regular service.

Joe Pesaturo, a T spokesman, said at the time that the MBTA had told Keolis that instead of asking for relief from the penalties, the commuter rail operator should be focusing on recovery.

But the MBTA eventually agreed with Keolis: Pesaturo on Friday said the MBTA has decided the company could not have performed up to par for several days because of the four snowstorms.

“The operating agreement includes exceptions for extraordinary events, and if the snowiest winter in the history of Boston doesn’t meet that criteria, then nothing will,” he wrote in an e-mail.

However, Pesaturo also said that the decision had no effect on the amount of the fines for late trains.

For January, the T fined Keolis $434,425 because of late trains, the maximum amount allowed under the contract. For other lapses, such as dirty trains and stations, the T fined Keolis $273,000.

For February, the T charged Keolis $434,425 in penalties for late trains, and $434,425 for other shortcomings.

Since Keolis took over as the commuter system’s operator last July, the T has assessed $4.07 million in penalties against the company.

Pesaturo said the tally for any fines from March will be available later this month.

About 80 percent of commuter rail trains ran on time last month, according to figures provided by the T. However, the figure does not include the percentage of trains that the company had canceled under a reduced schedule.

Because of complications from the severe weather, the company could not keep enough locomotives in service, so the T allowed Keolis to cancel 21 percent of its trains last month. Keolis officials said they occasionally added trains to these reduced schedules when locomotives became available.

State transportation library closed, to be replaced with digital archive

Call it the case of the missing library.

Boston, home of the oldest subway system in the country, has its fair share of transit historians and enthusiasts. For decades, they could visit a library on the second floor of the state Transportation Building in Boston to look up the minutiae of the history of subway lines, airplanes, or highway projects in Massachusetts.

Starting last summer, workers began packing up the materials from the library. But longtime fans had no idea where they were going.

“We just saw bookshelf after bookshelf disappearing,” said Stuart Spina, a 24-year-old MBTA and railway obsessive who has been going to the library regularly for a decade.

Spina assumed the Department of Transportation was going to redecorate the room. But when the books didn’t return after several months, he decided that the state agency had closed the library, Spina said.

On Friday, a Department of Transportation official said the historic materials were safely in storage. But he also confirmed that the library isn’t returning to the second floor.

“Ultimately, the contents of the library will be digitized and made publicly available,” said Michael Verseckes, a MassDOT spokesman.

The space was being “underutilized,” Verseckes said, so officials decided to make it into a training room. Verseckes said he didn’t know when the digital library would be open to the public.

Local transportation wonks will surely be upset over the library’s disappearance from the building.

An old, undated brochure cited a collection of 25,000 books and technical reports. It also had one reference that proved a particularly poignant harbinger of the library’s eventual fate, in trumpeting a high-tech gimmick called “On-line and CD-Rom searching of databases.”

In 2010, the library was renamed for the late George M. Sanborn, the longtime librarian who had become the state’s de facto dean of transit history.

Spina, who used to visit the library at least three times a week, said he hopes the documents will continue to be accessible.

“It was pretty cool to let people flip through 125-year-old documents,” he said. “It’s just not the same with a PDF.”

1,500 young riders to get discounts on T through trial-program lottery

Remember those spirited young protesters who got arrested last year in their quest for T youth discounts?

They’re finally getting their day.

Applications are open for a trial program that will offer 1,500 young people either $26 monthly passes or $7 weekly passes that offer unlimited rides on subway and bus lines.

The T offers similarly priced monthly and weekly passes to junior high and high school students, but those passes are valid only on weekdays. Standard monthly passes cost $75 and weekly passes are $19, with discounts also available for seniors and people with disabilities.

To enter a lottery for the new Youth Passes, T riders between the ages of 12 and 21, and who are residents of Boston, Chelsea, Malden, or Somerville, must apply by April 30.

In December, the T announced it would test out two new discount programs: the Youth Pass, and another partnership with local universities.

The pass program for college students is still being developed, said Pesaturo, the T spokesman.

The transit agency expects the programs to cost $696,000 in lost revenue and administrative expenses, he said.

Nicole Dungca can be reached at nicole.dungca@globe.com. Follow her on Twitter @ndungca.

Saturday, March 7, 2015

Preferred Site Chosen for Plaistow NH Commuter Rail Proposal

(SOURCE:  NH Union Leader) By Adam Swift


PLAISTOW – A site off Main Street on Joanne Drive is the preferred site for a commuter rail station and layover facility for the extension of MBTA service into Plaistow.

That potential site was officially presented during a public information session on the commuter rail study Tuesday night.

Over the next several months, the study will move into the environmental assessment phase, with an environmental assessment report expected to be completed and presented to the town by the end of April. That report will document potential environmental impacts of the Joanne Drive site versus not building a commuter rail station and layover facility at all, according to John Weston of HDR Engineering, the firm preparing the reports.

Although the commuter rail study is nearing completion, it will still be a long and difficult journey before the Haverhill commuter rail line could be running across the state line.

“With the completed report, it is my understanding that the Plaistow Board of Selectmen will present the report to other town boards for review and to provide feedback to them,” said Weston. “If the selectmen find (the commuter rail plan) beneficial to the community, then they will bring it to the town for a vote.”

Weston said no plan would move forward without the support of the town.

Even if the plan clears those hurdles, Weston said it would take a minimum of four to five years to complete.  Trains will be rolling by 2020 at the earliest, he said.

The town election on March 10 will guage how much support there is among residents for a commuter rail station and layover facility in Plaistow.  A citizens' group against the project has put forward a petition article asking voters if they support a station in town.

James Peck, one of the organizers of Citizens Against a Train Layover Yard in Plaistow, said he is hoping there is a heavy turnout at  town election voicing displeasure with the plan.

There also will be a reconfigured Board of Selectmen following the March 10 election, as three candidates are looking to fill two open seats on the board.

Two of those candidates, Tammy Bergeron and Julian Kiszka, have signed a pledge against the layover facility in town. The third candidate, Jim Wentworth, said he does not believe in signing a pledge, but has raised questions about the project.

During Tuesday night's meeting, Weston laid out some of the reasons why the Joanne Drive site was chosen as the preferred site over several other alternatives. He also provided some information on potential noise associated with the project, cost, and ridership figures.

Weston said the Joanne Drive site has the best regional access to Route 125, has less noise impact than other sites that were considered, has the fewest number of residential properties within a half mile, and allows for a potential connection to Plaistow center.

“Probably, at the most, there would be 300 people boarding the train every morning, and that would not be all at once,” said Weston. He said the 13 commuter trains that currently run during the day from Haverhill would extend to Plaistow.

The peak hours for traffic and ridership would be from 6:30 a.m. to 7:30 a.m., generating about 100 additional trips in the Joanne Drive area during that time.

The layover facility at the site would have tracks for six trains. Weston said there would be 50 buildings within the area where the sound of idling trains would be able to be heard over ambient noise. The potential for sound walls would reduce that number to 39, he added.

Weston also touched on the cost of the project. The capital costs for the Joanne Drive site would be just over $50 million.

The costs for the capital improvements are expected to come from a combination of federal funds with matching funds from Massachusetts, according to Weston.


PLAISTOW – A site off Main Street on Joanne Drive is the preferred site for a commuter rail station and layover facility for the extension of MBTA service into Plaistow.

That potential site was officially presented during a public information session on the commuter rail study Tuesday night.

Over the next several months, the study will move into the environmental assessment phase, with an environmental assessment report expected to be completed and presented to the town by the end of April. That report will document potential environmental impacts of the Joanne Drive site versus not building a commuter rail station and layover facility at all, according to John Weston of HDR Engineering, the firm preparing the reports.

Although the commuter rail study is nearing completion, it will still be a long and difficult journey before the Haverhill commuter rail line could be running across the state line.

“With the completed report, it is my understanding that the Plaistow Board of Selectmen will present the report to other town boards for review and to provide feedback to them,” said Weston. “If the selectmen find (the commuter rail plan) beneficial to the community, then they will bring it to the town for a vote.”

Weston said no plan would move forward without the support of the town.

Even if the plan clears those hurdles, Weston said it would take a minimum of four to five years to complete.  Trains will be rolling by 2020 at the earliest, he said.

The town election on March 10 will guage how much support there is among residents for a commuter rail station and layover facility in Plaistow.  A citizens' group against the project has put forward a petition article asking voters if they support a station in town.

James Peck, one of the organizers of Citizens Against a Train Layover Yard in Plaistow, said he is hoping there is a heavy turnout at  town election voicing displeasure with the plan.

There also will be a reconfigured Board of Selectmen following the March 10 election, as three candidates are looking to fill two open seats on the board.

Two of those candidates, Tammy Bergeron and Julian Kiszka, have signed a pledge against the layover facility in town. The third candidate, Jim Wentworth, said he does not believe in signing a pledge, but has raised questions about the project.

During Tuesday night's meeting, Weston laid out some of the reasons why the Joanne Drive site was chosen as the preferred site over several other alternatives. He also provided some information on potential noise associated with the project, cost, and ridership figures.

Weston said the Joanne Drive site has the best regional access to Route 125, has less noise impact than other sites that were considered, has the fewest number of residential properties within a half mile, and allows for a potential connection to Plaistow center.

“Probably, at the most, there would be 300 people boarding the train every morning, and that would not be all at once,” said Weston. He said the 13 commuter trains that currently run during the day from Haverhill would extend to Plaistow.

The peak hours for traffic and ridership would be from 6:30 a.m. to 7:30 a.m., generating about 100 additional trips in the Joanne Drive area during that time.

The layover facility at the site would have tracks for six trains. Weston said there would be 50 buildings within the area where the sound of idling trains would be able to be heard over ambient noise. The potential for sound walls would reduce that number to 39, he added.

Weston also touched on the cost of the project. The capital costs for the Joanne Drive site would be just over $50 million.

The costs for the capital improvements are expected to come from a combination of federal funds with matching funds from Massachusetts, according to Weston.




Comments


To improve the chance of seeing your comment posted here or published in the New Hampshire Union Leader:
  • Identify yourself. Accounts using fake or incomplete names are suspended regardless of the quality of posts.
  • Say something new, stay on topic, keep it short.
  • Links to outside URLs are discouraged, if used they should be on topic.
  • Avoid comments in bad taste, write well, avoid using all capital letters
  • Don't cite facts about individuals or businesses without providing a means to verify the claim
  • If you see an objectionable comment please click the "Report Abuse" button and be sure to tell us why.
Note: Comments are the opinion of the respective poster and not of the publisher.
Barton McLaine said Wednesday, February 25, 2015 at 11:28 am
****** the torpedoes and all sense.Just let's be very clear about this. Maggie and her henchmen are planning to spend a minimum,,, when have to ever seen the minimum spent,,,think Big Dig,,,of 300MILLION$$$$ of YOUR money to provide transportation to her 3,000 voters who moved here from Boston and vote Democrat blindly.~~~Talk about payoffs!

REPORT ABUSE

You must sign in before you can post comments. If you are experiencing issues with your account please e-mail abuse@unionleader.com.
   
- See more at: http://www.unionleader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20150225/NEWS0606/150229533/1022/NewHampshire#sthash.cvR3cnGm.dpuf

PLAISTOW – A site off Main Street on Joanne Drive is the preferred site for a commuter rail station and layover facility for the extension of MBTA service into Plaistow.

That potential site was officially presented during a public information session on the commuter rail study Tuesday night.

Over the next several months, the study will move into the environmental assessment phase, with an environmental assessment report expected to be completed and presented to the town by the end of April. That report will document potential environmental impacts of the Joanne Drive site versus not building a commuter rail station and layover facility at all, according to John Weston of HDR Engineering, the firm preparing the reports.

Although the commuter rail study is nearing completion, it will still be a long and difficult journey before the Haverhill commuter rail line could be running across the state line.

“With the completed report, it is my understanding that the Plaistow Board of Selectmen will present the report to other town boards for review and to provide feedback to them,” said Weston. “If the selectmen find (the commuter rail plan) beneficial to the community, then they will bring it to the town for a vote.”

Weston said no plan would move forward without the support of the town.

Even if the plan clears those hurdles, Weston said it would take a minimum of four to five years to complete.  Trains will be rolling by 2020 at the earliest, he said.

The town election on March 10 will guage how much support there is among residents for a commuter rail station and layover facility in Plaistow.  A citizens' group against the project has put forward a petition article asking voters if they support a station in town.

James Peck, one of the organizers of Citizens Against a Train Layover Yard in Plaistow, said he is hoping there is a heavy turnout at  town election voicing displeasure with the plan.

There also will be a reconfigured Board of Selectmen following the March 10 election, as three candidates are looking to fill two open seats on the board.

Two of those candidates, Tammy Bergeron and Julian Kiszka, have signed a pledge against the layover facility in town. The third candidate, Jim Wentworth, said he does not believe in signing a pledge, but has raised questions about the project.

During Tuesday night's meeting, Weston laid out some of the reasons why the Joanne Drive site was chosen as the preferred site over several other alternatives. He also provided some information on potential noise associated with the project, cost, and ridership figures.

Weston said the Joanne Drive site has the best regional access to Route 125, has less noise impact than other sites that were considered, has the fewest number of residential properties within a half mile, and allows for a potential connection to Plaistow center.

“Probably, at the most, there would be 300 people boarding the train every morning, and that would not be all at once,” said Weston. He said the 13 commuter trains that currently run during the day from Haverhill would extend to Plaistow.

The peak hours for traffic and ridership would be from 6:30 a.m. to 7:30 a.m., generating about 100 additional trips in the Joanne Drive area during that time.

The layover facility at the site would have tracks for six trains. Weston said there would be 50 buildings within the area where the sound of idling trains would be able to be heard over ambient noise. The potential for sound walls would reduce that number to 39, he added.

Weston also touched on the cost of the project. The capital costs for the Joanne Drive site would be just over $50 million.

The costs for the capital improvements are expected to come from a combination of federal funds with matching funds from Massachusetts, according to Weston.




Comments


To improve the chance of seeing your comment posted here or published in the New Hampshire Union Leader:
  • Identify yourself. Accounts using fake or incomplete names are suspended regardless of the quality of posts.
  • Say something new, stay on topic, keep it short.
  • Links to outside URLs are discouraged, if used they should be on topic.
  • Avoid comments in bad taste, write well, avoid using all capital letters
  • Don't cite facts about individuals or businesses without providing a means to verify the claim
  • If you see an objectionable comment please click the "Report Abuse" button and be sure to tell us why.
Note: Comments are the opinion of the respective poster and not of the publisher.
Barton McLaine said Wednesday, February 25, 2015 at 11:28 am
****** the torpedoes and all sense.Just let's be very clear about this. Maggie and her henchmen are planning to spend a minimum,,, when have to ever seen the minimum spent,,,think Big Dig,,,of 300MILLION$$$$ of YOUR money to provide transportation to her 3,000 voters who moved here from Boston and vote Democrat blindly.~~~Talk about payoffs!

REPORT ABUSE

You must sign in before you can post comments. If you are experiencing issues with your account please e-mail abuse@unionleader.com.
   
- See more at: http://www.unionleader.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20150225/NEWS0606/150229533/1022/NewHampshire#sthash.cvR3cnGm.dpuf

Monday, March 2, 2015

MBTA Fines Company That Runs Commuter Rail System $434K for February Delays | NECN

MBTA Fines Company That Runs Commuter Rail System $434K for February Delays | NECN

Man Loses Pants in Escalator Mishap at MBTA Station

SOURCE:  Man loses pants in escalator mishap at rail station | Local News - WCVB Home

SOMERVILLE, Mass. —A commuter using Boston area's subway system literally got his knickers in a twist, when a train station escalator ripped off his pants.


Joe Pesaturo, a spokesman for the Massachusetts Bay Transportation
Authority, told the Boston Herald that the accident on Thursday morning
happened at Davis Station in Somerville. It was the second escalator
mishap involving clothing on the "T'' in two days.


The man whose pants got stuck in the escalator wasn't hurt. Fellow commuters say he
was left standing in blue shorts while his pants were stuck in the
bottom of the escalator.


On Wednesday, an 89-year-old man was injured when he fell and his coat got caught in an escalator at the Chinatown Station.


MBTA officials are urging escalator riders to be mindful of loose clothing.

Wednesday, November 26, 2014

First Rebuilt MBTA Light Rail Vehicle Arrives in Boston MA

(SOURCE:  Trains.com NewsWire)

BOSTON – The first rebuilt Massachusetts Bay Transportation Authority Type 7 trolley used on the agency’s Green Line is set to arrive in Boston this week. The car will arrive from Alstom Transportation in Hornell, N. Y. that won a $104 million contract with the MBTA in 2012 to conduct a “complete systems overhaul” of 86 of the transit agency’s Type 7 trolleys.

MBTA spokesman Joe Pesaturo tells Boston Magazine that the car will be subjected to two months of performance testing. Then, it will go into passenger service sometime between late January and early February of 2015.

Pesaturo says that, besides the updates to the trains’ systems and “full modernization” of the light-rail vehicles, the cars are also being outfitted with new interior surfaces and new propulsion and climate control systems.

The other 85 light-rail vehicles, most of which are still in service, will be sent to Alstom, refurbished, and return to Boston by January 2017, according to the MBTA, but Alstom says it expects to have the project completed by October 2016.

The cars were originally built in 1986, 1987, and 1997 by Kinki-Sharyo of Osaka, Japan, and assembled at the former Westinghouse Plant in Readville.

In May, the Massachusetts Department of Transportation board of directors, the state entity that oversees MBTA’s operations, awarded a $118 million contract to CAF USA Inc. to construct 24 new “Type 9” Light Rail vehicles for use on the Green Line. They will arrive between 2017 and 2019.

Tuesday, September 2, 2014

Western MA Commuter Rail Not Yet A Reality

(SOURCE:  New England Public Radio)

Massachusetts officials announced Wednesday the state has an agreement to purchase the right-of-way for nearly fifty miles of railroad running between Greenfield and Springfield. Amtrak service is scheduled to begin late this year on the line, but  a more regular commuter service is far from a done deal.

Several Massachusetts officials including Governor Deval Patrick pulled into Greenfield on a special train from North Adams to announce the deal between the state and Pan-Am Railways.  This could open the door to a north-south commuter rail service in the future. Department of Transportation head Richard Davey says while there is money to refurbish old train cars the state already owns, there is still one key ingredient missing to make this a reality.

“When you’re talking about a service over a long period of time, on an annual basis, you have to come up with some revenue,” Davey says. “So at this point we don’t have it, but I don’t think it’s that much either. We’re coming up with some calculations to give a sense to the legislature and the next administration what it would be.”

State officials are targeting December 29 as the day Amtrak’s Vermonter service will begin using the line. To start, one train is expected to run in each direction daily

Wednesday, April 30, 2014

Foot Traffic to Ayer's MBTA Station Detoured by Property Owner's Fence

(SOURCE:  Lowell Sun)


AYER -- Riders on the commuter rail are finding a fence blocking their usual path to the rail station, after private-property owner Phil Berry erected the fence along the lines of his property in a surprise move on Sunday.

The fence, which runs along the track and makes a right angle along Archer's Mobil, redirects people to walk around the lot behind Carlin's Tavern and by the gas station to get on the commuter-rail platform.

The town did not receive official notification, according to a public advisory sent to Nashoba Publishing today by Town Administrator Robert Pontbriand.

"This appears to be a property dispute between Mr. Phil Berry and the MBTA," the statement reads. "The town of Ayer does not own any of the property in dispute."

But MBTA spokesman Joe Pesaturo clarified that there is no property dispute between the MBTA and Berry, who told the MBTA he has been trying to work with the town and the Montachusett Regional Transit Authority since last year, Pesaturo said.

"The MBTA will work with the town of Ayer, the Montachusett Regional Transit Authority and the property owner to identify and implement a resolution," Pesaturo said in an email.

Pesaturo said the MBTA inherited the Boston & Maine railroad right-of-way decades ago, including "deeded rights" that allow the public to walk over the property to get to the train.

Commuters can typically access the train by walking across the lot Berry owns behind Carlin's Tavern, but the newly constructed fence forces passengers to walk on the outskirts of his property along the gas station.

The town is in consultation with the MBTA and MART over the matter, according to the statement from Pontbriand, but it has no legal jurisdiction over Berry's property or the platform and property owned by the MBTA.

"The town of Ayer will respond to public safety/health emergencies at the train-station platform only," the statement reads.

When reached by phone on Sunday, Berry offered no comment and hung up.

Bruno Fisher, deputy administrator for MART, said the MBTA, MART and the town have been working with Berry on establishing safe access to the station for about a year.

The town received $3.2 million in October for the expansion of the Rail Trail parking lot, but Fisher said one stipulation requires clear access to the station.

Fisher said MART does not have a preference on station access, but is leaving it up to the wishes of the MBTA and the Federal Transit Administration, which approved the grant.

But some parcels along Park Street must be sold before the project comes to fruition, Nashoba Publishing reported in October. Berry also owns property on Park Street.

The dispute, Fisher said, is really between the MBTA and Berry, as the MBTA has the easement allowing commuters to walk across Berry's property.

"I gather it's his contention that he owns the property," Fisher said.

"He's going to apparently try to dictate the pathway that he wants to have used out there for the commuter rail patrons that use that specific station."

Standing near the fence early Monday morning, Police Chief William Murray said police are not making any changes to their regular game plan, noting that their issue is only getting people across the street safely.

The Look of Things to Come... MBTA #2001

MBTA #2001 pushes an inbound commuter through Ayer MA, on the way to Boston.  In time, the sound of EMD engines will become less common on T rails...

Saturday, February 15, 2014

Lowell MA Commuter Rail to Temporarily Lose 500 Parking Spaces

(SOURCE:  Nashua Telegraph, by David Brooks)

LOWELL, Mass. – New Hampshire-to-Boston commuters who board commuter rail in Lowell are facing some unpleasant news: Almost two-thirds of the parking garage at the train station will be closed for at least a year.

“There will be an impact. I won’t deny that, but we’re trying to minimize that,” said James Scanlan, administrator of the Lowell Regional Transit Authority. 

The $7 million construction project will rebuild one of the parking garages and has been in the works for several years, but some commuters only learned of it Monday when Scanlan distributed an announcement.

“A problem? Big-time,” said Scott Beausoleil, a Nashua native who graduated from Bishop Guertin in 1980 and has commuted into Boston for much of the last 22 years by boarding the MBTA Commuter Rail line at Lowell.

“You don’t so much mind it in the spring to late fall – but boy, come winter, you can understand what traffic can be like, especially if the weather’s bad,” said Beausoleil, who is a case administrator in the bankruptcy field. 

The problem is that a 30-year-old, four-story parking garage known as Gallagher I is crumbling to the point that it can’t be repaired any more, Scanlan said. 

“We’ve been putting money into it, federal and state money, for at least the last 7 or 8 years … probably $1 million, for concrete repairs,” he said. “But the amount of deterioration that has occurred in the concrete, from water, salt … the (federal government) came in and said they were reluctant to fund it any more. They did a review of the structure with us and said we should be doing a more comprehensive overhaul of the garage.” 

All the concrete in the garage will be removed and replaced, meaning Gallagher I has to shut for about a year, starting around April 1, so the concrete can be removed and replaced. The $7 million project will be paid for with $2.5 million in federal transportation money with the rest coming from Massachusetts state funds. 

Compounding the difficulty for commuters is that a two-story addition, known as Gallagher II, can only be reached by driving through Gallagher I – therefore Gallagher II also will have to be shut for the duration of the work. 

The adjoining Rourke Garage will remain open because it has a separate entrance.
The result, said Scanlan, is that about 550 of 950 parking spaces at what is officially called the Gallagher Intermodal Center will be unavailable for a year. 

The three garages are rarely full to the brim, Scanlan said – peak usage usually tops out around 780 vehicles – but they’re popular with commuters from the New Hampshire side of the state border. On average, about 20 percent of the vehicles in the garage, between 120 and 150 vehicles, have New Hampshire license plates, Scanlan said. 

Scanlan said the Lowell transit authority is negotiating with several nearby commercial sites, including the YMCA, to lease some parking spaces for the duration of the project. 

They also may use some 80 spaces at the system’s maintenance facility. Another option is the Early Garage, owned by the city, although it’s far enough away from the Gallagher Center that a shuttle bus would become necessary.

Details will be announced as they’re worked out, Scanlan said.

As for Beausoleil, he said the situation supports something that he has been saying for years: Commuter rail should extend to Nashua. Then local residents wouldn’t have to worry about what Lowell does.

Thursday, January 30, 2014

True Line Trains Releases MBTA 010 & 011 in HO Scale

True Line Trains has released an HO scale model of MBTA MP36PH-3C diesels #010 & 011, in DC (MSRP $189) or DCC with sound (MSRP $329).  You don't see many factory decorated MBTA models!  Info can be found on their WEBSITE.  



 

Thursday, January 9, 2014

French Firm Keolis Wins MBTA Commuter Rail Contract

SOURCE:  Boston Globe - Martine Powers

Keolis — a French transit company with experience running rail systems in the United States, Europe, and Australia — will take over operation of the Massachusetts commuter rail system starting July 1, the state Department of Transportation’s board of directors decided Wednesday.

The company won the state’s largest operating contract in history with a bid that was 6 percent lower than that of the current operator, the Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad Co., which has operated the system since 2003.

MBTA general manager Beverly A. Scott, making one of the highest-profile decisions since she took over the T a little more than a year ago, said the agency will save $254 million over the term of a full 12-year contract.

“Keolis’s proposal presents the best combination of technical quality and price, and is more advantageous to the MBTA,” Scott said.

For the 127,000 people who ride the commuter rail’s 14 lines each day, much will remain the same. The new contractor will have no control over fare prices, and most of the trains and other equipment will remain the same. The new company will, however, face more frequent inspections of its trains and stiffer penalties for poor service.

Keolis officials now must mobilize quickly to take over the system in just over five months. By Feb. 1, the company’s Massachusetts operation, Keolis Commuter Services, is expected to have a management team in place, Scott said.

Keolis’s chief executive of international operations, Bernard Tabary, who flew from Paris Tuesday for the vote, said the company is prepared for a quick takeover.

“We’ve been working on this bid for over two years, and that includes mobilization,” Tabary said. “It’s going to be a lot of work, but it’s positive work, and we look forward to it.”

On Tuesday, state officials revealed the price tag for the contract: $2.68 billion over eight years, with the possibility for two two-year extensions that could bring the total price to $4.3 billion.

Keolis will be paid $304 million in the first year of its contract. This year, Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad was paid $316 million for base operations.

Much of the difference between the two bids came down to profits, Scott said. Keolis’s estimated profit margin was 77 percent lower than its rival, achieved in part with a promise to pay lower salaries for administrative positions.

The Massachusetts contract will be the biggest US system for Keolis. Some transit specialists suggested that Keolis may be willing to operate the system with a smaller profit margin in order to have a major American commuter rail system in its portfolio, a feather in its cap that could open doors to other high-profile transit contracts in North America. Keolis currently runs the Virginia Railway Express, a commuter rail in the suburbs of Washington, D.C., with 32 trains and 21,000 passengers daily.

Scott’s recommendation of Keolis as the winning bidder was unanimously approved by the MassDOT’s board of directors. Scott said the French company scored well on a number of criteria.
Aside from the pricetag, in other measures considered during the procurement process, Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad received an overall rating of acceptable, while Keolis received a higher overall rating of good. For example, Keolis has a better record on engineering services, management, and information technology, according to the T. But Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad has a better record of contracting with minority businesses.

The T will also save money on the new commuter rail contract because potential rewards that would be paid to the operator for meeting on-time performance — a controversial practice during Mass. Bay’s tenure — were removed from this contract. Scott also told the board that the contract contains more potential penalties for poor service, $12 million per year versus $3 million per year.

“Bottom line, in the new contract these incentives and offsets have been eliminated,” Scott said.
The new contract also increases daily inspection requirements for the trains, puts in place a remedial action plan if Keolis fails to meet expectations, and allows the T to relieve Keolis of certain duties if they are not performed well, for example, snow removal. If that were to happen, Keolis would not be paid for that work.

Before making its decision in a public meeting Wednesday, the MassDOT board listened to two hours of public comments.

The Rev. Bruce H. Wall, who had lambasted Keolis last month for allegations of discriminatory practices, made an about-face, saying that after talks with the company, he “wholeheartedly” endorsed Keolis.

James O’Leary, chairman of Massachusetts Bay Commuter Railroad and a former general manager of the T, told the board that he believed the procurement process had failed to conduct a thorough vetting of the companies, a move that was particularly galling, he said, after 10 years of partnership with the T.

“After all that, we had a sum total of a 45-minute interview,” he continued. “We can only conclude that our proposal was never seriously considered or understood.”

Ronald J. Hartman, chief executive of the rail division at Veolia Transportation, Mass. Bay’s largest shareholder, warned that the T did not know enough about the differences between the two companies. “My only question is, Do you really know what you’re getting with the proposal you’re about to review?” Hartman said. “And do you know what you would have gotten from our proposal, had you had that kind of in-depth discussion and evaluation?”

Scott countered that the T had conducted several written exchanges with each bidder and that the MBTA responded to more than 1,000 questions from both.

Though the MassDOT board voted unanimously in favor of Keolis, their questions seemed to indicate that it was not without some reservations.

Board chairman John R. Jenkins said he needed to know that the T had a plan in place to quickly usher in a new contractor, a process that will cost the T $9 million. Jenkins said Governor Deval Patrick had expressed concern that there might be interruptions in service for commuters.

“They’re going to have to get their feet on the gas pedal,” Jenkins said after the meeting. “They’ve got to keep this thing moving in order to make sure that we do get there on time.”

Janice Loux, another member of the board and a union organizer, said she was also concerned that the smaller pricetag for Keolis’s services could have an effect on union workers’ next contracts.

“The proposed savings are remarkable, just remarkable!” said Loux, with a touch of sarcasm in her voice. “Has the general manager verified that the savings are true and achievable? What are the impacts to the size of the workforce, labor agreements, and benefit packages?”

She continued, “I’m looking forward to seeing this workforce taken care of.”

Representatives of various commuter rail unions — including former state senator Steven A. Tolman, president of the Massachusetts AFL-CIO — expressed similar concerns, saying they were dismayed to learn of the change. 

Daniel N. Tavares of the International Association of Machinists and Aerospace Workers said he doubted Keolis would be able to offer improved service while receiving millions less than its predecessor.

“There’s training, there’s a learning curve; a new company coming in just doesn’t sound responsible,” Tavares said. 

Andrew Mannion, president of the International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers, said he was concerned that the deal would go the same way as the T’s much-criticized contract with Bay State Transit in 1999, a maintenance contract that was given to the lowest bidder, only to blow up when the company proved incapable. 

Mannion said union officials would not accept lower salaries for members. “Under no scenario would we agree to terms that does not fairly compensate our members,” Mannion said.