Showing posts with label pan am. Show all posts
Showing posts with label pan am. Show all posts

Thursday, May 19, 2022

CSX Receives Approval from Surface Transportation Board to Acquire Pan Am Railways

Trains SEPO & BFPO, Westford MA 2016
(SOURCE:  CSX)

JACKSONVILLE, Fla. – April 14, 2022 – CSX Corp. (NASDAQ: CSX) today announced that the Surface Transportation Board (STB) approved CSX’s application to acquire Pan Am Railways, Inc. (Pan Am). CSX will move forward with the acquisition with a planned closing date of June 1, 2022, at which time CSX will acquire control of Pan Am.

“CSX is pleased that the STB approved the proposed acquisition of Pan Am and has recognized the significant benefits this transaction will bring to shippers and other New England stakeholders,” said president and chief executive officer, James M. Foote. “We look forward to integrating Pan Am, their employees and the rail-served industries of the Northeast into CSX and to working in partnership with connecting railroads to provide exceptional supply chain solutions to New England and beyond.”

David A. Fink, president of Pan Am Railways said: “This much anticipated decision paves the way for an exciting new chapter for Pan Am customers and our employees as we begin our transition to the CSX team.”

Adding Pan Am to our network will extend the reach of our service to a wider customer base over an expanded territory, creating new efficiencies and market prospects for customers to capitalize on a robust pipeline of growth opportunities to move freight to, from and within New England.

With this transaction, New England will benefit from CSX’s track record as a leader in environmental performance. CSX will operate Pan Am with a more reliable and more fuel-efficient fleet, significantly reducing fuel consumption and improving rail’s environmental footprint in the region.

Passenger and commuter carriers in New England will benefit as the company is committed to maintaining or improving existing passenger service that operates on Pan Am. CSX has a long-standing history of working cooperatively with Amtrak and other passenger rail partners as evidenced by the significant improvement in contractual on-time performance with Amtrak since CSX has implemented its new operating model.

Headquartered in North Billerica, Massachusetts, Pan Am owns and operates a highly integrated, nearly 1,200-mile rail network and has a partial interest in the more than 600-mile Pan Am Southern system. Pan Am’s network across New England has access to multiple ports and large-scale commodity producers. The transaction will expand CSX’s reach in Connecticut, New York and Massachusetts while adding Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine to its existing 23-state network.

Terms of the transaction were not disclosed. Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC acted as financial advisor and Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP acted as legal advisor to CSX in connection with the transaction.


Friday, February 4, 2022

Athearn / Roundhouse HO Pan Am EMD F7A Locomotives PAR1 & PAR2

Just announced, and due March of 2023, is the Athearn/Roundhouse HO scale Pan Am EMD F7A pair of locomotives, PAR1 and PAR2. 


  • 5-pole motor with precision-machined flywheels and multi-link drive train for trouble-free operation
  • All-wheel drive with precision gears for smooth and quiet operation
  • All-wheel electrical pickup provides reliable current flow
  • Heavy die-cast frame for greater traction and more pulling power
  • Clear plastic cab and/or portal windows
  • Single or dual headlight per prototype
  • Separately-applied horns
  • McHenry® operating scale knuckle couplers
  • DCC Ready 21 pin plug
  • Machined metal wheels with RP25 contours operate on all popular brand of track
  • Fully-assembled and ready-to-run out of the box
  • Painted and printed for realistic decoration
  • Highly-detailed, injection-molded body
  • Minimum radius: 18”
  • Recommended radius: 22”

Wednesday, December 2, 2020

CSX to Acquire Pan Am Railways in New England

SOURCE: 12:19 pm ET December 1, 2020 (Globe Newswire)

CSX Corp. (NASDAQ: CSX) today announced that it has signed a definitive agreement to acquire New England's Pan Am Railways, Inc. ("Pan Am"), whose rail carrier subsidiaries comprise North America's largest regional railroad.

Headquartered in North Billerica, Massachusetts, Pan Am owns and operates a highly integrated, nearly 1,200-mile rail network and has a partial interest in the more than 600-mile Pan Am Southern system. Pan Am's network across New England has access to multiple ports and large-scale commodity producers. The transaction will expand CSX's reach in Connecticut, New York and Massachusetts while adding Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine to its existing 23-state network.

The transaction will provide significant benefits to shippers and local communities as CSX integrates Pan Am into its best-in-class network. CSX made nearly $1.5 billion in infrastructure capital expenditures in its network in 2019, supporting economic growth and ensuring the safety and efficiency of the supply chain.

James M. Foote, president and chief executive officer of CSX, said: "In Pan Am, CSX gains a strong regional rail network in one of the most densely populated markets in the U.S., creating new efficiencies and market opportunities for customers as we continue to grow. We intend to bring CSX's customer-centric focus and industry-leading operating model to shippers and industries served by Pan Am. We look forward to integrating Pan Am into CSX, with substantial benefits to the rail-served industries of the Northeast, and to working in partnership with connecting railroads to provide exceptional supply chain solutions to New England and beyond."

David A. Fink, president of Pan Am Railways, said: "Pan Am is pleased to reach this agreement with CSX, a North American leader in rail-based freight transportation. This is great news for New England shippers and the national freight network overall."

Terms of the transaction were not disclosed. The transaction is subject to regulatory review and approval by the Surface Transportation Board.

Goldman Sachs & Co. LLC is acting as financial advisor and Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP is acting as legal advisor to CSX in connection with the transaction.

Tuesday, March 17, 2020

Empty Bow NH Coal Train at West Chelmsford MA 3/17/20


Empty Bow (NH) coal train passes through West Chelmsford MA on a dreary St. Patrick's Day (3/17/20). Power was MEC/Pan Am 7620/7535/7542. It was strange seeing CSX coal cars instead of NS ones!

Thursday, February 13, 2020

West End Hoosac Tunnel Liner Collapse

There has been a failure of the liner on the west end of Hoosac Tunnel, causing debris to partly cover the track.

Norfolk Southern has issued the following press release:

Feb 12, 2020

Norfolk Southern’s partner, Pan Am Railways, has reported a partial wall collapse in the Hoosac Tunnel which affects all trains operating between Mechanicsville, New York, and Ayer, Massachusetts.  Pan Am Railway’s engineering department is evaluating the situation and Norfolk Southern will provide updates as they are available.  Customers with traffic in the affected area should expect delays of at least 48 hours.
LINKS:

https://www.wwlp.com/news/hoosac-tunnel-out-of-service-for-structural-evaluation/

https://www.rtands.com/freight/norfolk-southern-short-line-partner-suffers-partial-tunnel-wall-collapse/

https://www.news10.com/news/local-news/partially-collapsed-hoosac-tunnel-was-an-1800s-engineering-feat/

https://www.wwlp.com/news/local-news/berkshire-county/hoosac-tunnel-out-of-service-for-structural-evaluation/

UPDATE:
Videos are starting to be posted of the collapse



Monday, January 21, 2019

Recent New England Model Railroad Announcements JAN 2019

It had been a while since I sifted through my model railroad new-release emails, so I finally sat down and put together this update:


HO SCALE
ATLAS:  EMD GP7 Diesel Locomotive – Bangor & Aroostook


N SCALE
ATLAS:  EMD GP38 Diesel Locomotive – Bangor & Aroostook
MICRO TRAINS:  Weathered 2-Boxcar Set – Boston & Maine (#020 44 696) 


O SCALE

Sunday, July 8, 2018

Thursday, January 25, 2018

Train Derails in Worcester MA, Blocking Burncoat Street and Diverting Traffic

JAN 24, 2018:  Part of Pan Am/CSX freight SEPO derailed Wednesday (1/24/18) morning, creating traffic problems in Worcester but causing no injuries...  Three locomotives and several box cars at the front of the train came off the tracks around 8 a.m... the train came to a stop just south of West Mountain Street just past where the tracks go under West Boylston Street. The box cars that went off the tracks were directly behind the three engines...  District Fire Chief Daniel O’Neil said the cars affected by the derailment were carrying paper. He said that for safety reasons, it is common practice to have cars without hazardous materials directly behind the engine. Other cars on the train contained liquefied petroleum gas. He said they were not affected by the derailment.

http://www.masslive.com/news/worcester/index.ssf/2018/01/train_derails_in_worcester_blo.html
https://worcestermag.com/2018/01/24/train-derails-off-burncoat-street/56966
http://www.telegram.com/news/20180124/derailed-train-moved-traffic-flowing-on-burncoat-street-in-worcester

Tuesday, December 6, 2016

Pan Am Freight Train Derails in New Britain CT

(SOURCE:  Fox61) (video:  http://fox61.com/2016/12/06/freight-train-derails-in-new-britain-columbus-blvd-closed/#ooid=hicjMzODE6Ie0NZbbi0Cbrj9o0aHDOc3)

NEW BRITAIN -- An investigation is ongoing into what caused a train to derail in New Britain Tuesday afternoon.

According to the New Britain Police Department, a freight train derailed on Columbus Boulevard around 3:45 p.m. on Tuesday. The road is closed in the center of town. Some side streets may be impacted as well.
The Route 9 northbound Exit 26 off ramp is also closed, according to the state Department of Transportation.
No injuries have been reported.

It is a Pan Am Railways train, and will likely be in place for about 24  hours before authorities can remove it. The train was carrying construction debris, but there wren't any hazardous materials on board.

The train has 29 cars--10 were empty, 19 were filled--and in all nine derailed. Of the nine that derailed, seven were on their side; the other two remained upright, but were off the tracks. All nine had debris inside.
The train was headed to a processing facility in Deerfield, Massachusetts, to recycle the debris.

The acting police chief and Mayor Erin Stewart are on the scene assessing the situation. Pan Am will conduct its own investigation, but the Federal Railroad Administration will also send out a crew to look into the cause.

Cynthia Scarano, from Pan Am's media relations team, said, "We're in the process of transporting the equipment necessary to re-rail, unblock the crossing and move the cars." That equipment includes a crane, she told FOX 61.

"It will take up to 24 hours to get everything moving again," Scarano said, however, police say traffic is a priority and the local roads should reopen later Tuesday evening.

The Department of Energy and Environmental Protection did respond to the scene to assess the contents and what cargo got out, but it does not appear that there are any hazmat issues.

Wednesday, September 30, 2015

Pan Am Eyes Downtown Portsmouth NH for Unloading Propane Train

(SOURCE:  Union Leader)


PORTSMOUTH — City officials with safety concerns may try to derail a possible plan by Pan Am Railways to unload propane from rail cars along tracks in the heart of Portsmouth.

Details of the proposal are still being ironed out, but a top Pan Am Railways official confirmed Monday that Portsmouth is one of the sites the company is eyeing as it tries to meet the region’s growing demand for propane.


The area under consideration is located in a rail yard in the city’s downtown near the historic Old North Cemetery on Maplewood Avenue and Gary’s Beverages on Deer Street.

“Because of its location, it is a location that we’re looking at for potentially transloading propane,” said Cynthia Scarano, executive vice president of Pan Am Railways.


According to Scarano, the propane would arrive by rail, and would then be pumped into trucks from different propane companies that would transport it from the site.


Scarano said Pan Am, which owns the tracks, is still considering other sites as well for an offloading facility and hasn’t made a final decision.


City officials said they haven’t received any formal propane plan for downtown, but are aware of the possibility.


“If this were to occur, certainly there would be concerns and the city would take every action possible to protect residents. We plan on opposing this,” Deputy City Manager David Allen said Monday.


The possible propane plan comes as the city continues to appeal the Newington Planning Board’s decision to give Sea-3 the go-ahead to expand its propane storage terminal in Newington to accommodate rail deliveries. Trains to Newington travel through downton Portsmouth, and the city has fought Sea-3’s stalled expansion plan amid concerns about rail safety and increased risk of mishaps involving propane deliveries.


Jane Ferrini, a city staff attorney, said Pan Am would have to meet various local, state and federal regulations to move ahead with any off-loading plan in Portsmouth.


She said the offices of the state fire marshal and Gov. Maggie Hassan have also been made aware of the possibility.


While plans are still preliminary, Ferrini said the city “has explored various legal avenues” in the event Pan Am moves ahead.


The plan would not involve the installation of any holding tanks to store propane at the site, Scarano said.


“Safety is our No. 1 priority and we’ll make sure we follow all the regulations,” Scarano said.

The downtown site is a “primary” spot because “it’s a central location of where we need to get this propane delivered to,” she said.


When asked if the delays in Sea-3’s expansion prompted Pan Am’s plan, Scarano responded, “What’s behind it is the fact that propane use as far as rail shipment is up 35 percent and that’s just because it’s considered a clean fuel now.”


Scarano confirmed that Pan Am officials were asked to meet with the governor’s office and others about the plan, including energy directors around New England.


She said she’s not sure when the plan could move forward because it all depends on demand, but she insisted that it would be within the coming months.


If the area sees an early cold snap and demand spikes while supply is low, Scarano said the off-loading plan would be needed sooner rather than later.

PORTSMOUTH — City officials with safety concerns may try to derail a possible plan by Pan Am Railways to unload propane from rail cars along tracks in the heart of Portsmouth.

Details of the proposal are still being ironed out, but a top Pan Am Railways official confirmed Monday that Portsmouth is one of the sites the company is eyeing as it tries to meet the region’s growing demand for propane.

The area under consideration is located in a rail yard in the city’s downtown near the historic Old North Cemetery on Maplewood Avenue and Gary’s Beverages on Deer Street.

“Because of its location, it is a location that we’re looking at for potentially transloading propane,” said Cynthia Scarano, executive vice president of Pan Am Railways.

According to Scarano, the propane would arrive by rail, and would then be pumped into trucks from different propane companies that would transport it from the site.

Scarano said Pan Am, which owns the tracks, is still considering other sites as well for an offloading facility and hasn’t made a final decision.

City officials said they haven’t received any formal propane plan for downtown, but are aware of the possibility.

“If this were to occur, certainly there would be concerns and the city would take every action possible to protect residents. We plan on opposing this,” Deputy City Manager David Allen said Monday.

The possible propane plan comes as the city continues to appeal the Newington Planning Board’s decision to give Sea-3 the go-ahead to expand its propane storage terminal in Newington to accommodate rail deliveries. Trains to Newington travel through downton Portsmouth, and the city has fought Sea-3’s stalled expansion plan amid concerns about rail safety and increased risk of mishaps involving propane deliveries.

Jane Ferrini, a city staff attorney, said Pan Am would have to meet various local, state and federal regulations to move ahead with any off-loading plan in Portsmouth.

She said the offices of the state fire marshal and Gov. Maggie Hassan have also been made aware of the possibility.

While plans are still preliminary, Ferrini said the city “has explored various legal avenues” in the event Pan Am moves ahead.

The plan would not involve the installation of any holding tanks to store propane at the site, Scarano said.

“Safety is our No. 1 priority and we’ll make sure we follow all the regulations,” Scarano said.

The downtown site is a “primary” spot because “it’s a central location of where we need to get this propane delivered to,” she said.

When asked if the delays in Sea-3’s expansion prompted Pan Am’s plan, Scarano responded, “What’s behind it is the fact that propane use as far as rail shipment is up 35 percent and that’s just because it’s considered a clean fuel now.”

Scarano confirmed that Pan Am officials were asked to meet with the governor’s office and others about the plan, including energy directors around New England.

She said she’s not sure when the plan could move forward because it all depends on demand, but she insisted that it would be within the coming months.

If the area sees an early cold snap and demand spikes while supply is low, Scarano said the off-loading plan would be needed sooner rather than later. - See more at: http://www.unionleader.com/Pan_Am_eyes_downtown_Portsmouth_for_possible_propane_plan#sthash.1VNIbG4a.dpuf
PORTSMOUTH — City officials with safety concerns may try to derail a possible plan by Pan Am Railways to unload propane from rail cars along tracks in the heart of Portsmouth.

Details of the proposal are still being ironed out, but a top Pan Am Railways official confirmed Monday that Portsmouth is one of the sites the company is eyeing as it tries to meet the region’s growing demand for propane.

The area under consideration is located in a rail yard in the city’s downtown near the historic Old North Cemetery on Maplewood Avenue and Gary’s Beverages on Deer Street.

“Because of its location, it is a location that we’re looking at for potentially transloading propane,” said Cynthia Scarano, executive vice president of Pan Am Railways.

According to Scarano, the propane would arrive by rail, and would then be pumped into trucks from different propane companies that would transport it from the site.

Scarano said Pan Am, which owns the tracks, is still considering other sites as well for an offloading facility and hasn’t made a final decision.

City officials said they haven’t received any formal propane plan for downtown, but are aware of the possibility.

“If this were to occur, certainly there would be concerns and the city would take every action possible to protect residents. We plan on opposing this,” Deputy City Manager David Allen said Monday.

The possible propane plan comes as the city continues to appeal the Newington Planning Board’s decision to give Sea-3 the go-ahead to expand its propane storage terminal in Newington to accommodate rail deliveries. Trains to Newington travel through downton Portsmouth, and the city has fought Sea-3’s stalled expansion plan amid concerns about rail safety and increased risk of mishaps involving propane deliveries.

Jane Ferrini, a city staff attorney, said Pan Am would have to meet various local, state and federal regulations to move ahead with any off-loading plan in Portsmouth.

She said the offices of the state fire marshal and Gov. Maggie Hassan have also been made aware of the possibility.

While plans are still preliminary, Ferrini said the city “has explored various legal avenues” in the event Pan Am moves ahead.

The plan would not involve the installation of any holding tanks to store propane at the site, Scarano said.

“Safety is our No. 1 priority and we’ll make sure we follow all the regulations,” Scarano said.

The downtown site is a “primary” spot because “it’s a central location of where we need to get this propane delivered to,” she said.

When asked if the delays in Sea-3’s expansion prompted Pan Am’s plan, Scarano responded, “What’s behind it is the fact that propane use as far as rail shipment is up 35 percent and that’s just because it’s considered a clean fuel now.”

Scarano confirmed that Pan Am officials were asked to meet with the governor’s office and others about the plan, including energy directors around New England.

She said she’s not sure when the plan could move forward because it all depends on demand, but she insisted that it would be within the coming months.

If the area sees an early cold snap and demand spikes while supply is low, Scarano said the off-loading plan would be needed sooner rather than later. - See more at: http://www.unionleader.com/Pan_Am_eyes_downtown_Portsmouth_for_possible_propane_plan#sthash.1VNIbG4a.dpuf

Sunday, May 31, 2015

Removal of Old Rail Ties First Step in Cleanup

(SOURCE:  Daily Hampshire Gazette)

Load by load, old railroad ties that pose a fire hazard are being hauled away in Northampton and Holyoke MA, days after a Northampton lawmaker called for the state Department of Transportation to act. Now that it has acknowledged the problem, the DOT must accelerate the removal of ties along the entire rail corridor.

State Rep. Peter V. Kocot, who contacted transportation officials after reading a May 11 Gazette story about debris and rail ties along the Pan Am Railways line, said he wants to get all parties involved in the $131 million track renovation project to meet and plan a cleanup.

Rather than vague dates earlier cited by the DOT, a specific timetable is needed and railroad contractors must be held to deadlines. Pan Am Railways has not responded to Gazette requests for information about its plan to clear away old ties and unsightly piles of discarded construction material.

Until the estimated 95,000 used ties are gone, they continue to pose a threat to the public. Just this month, a major brush fire in Athol spread to abandoned rail ties that when ignited produced heavy smoke and forced state officials to issue an air-quality alert. Rail ties contain creosote and oils and are considered a heavy fuel source for fire.

The state DOT says ties will be removed from within Northampton by the end of June. But that addresses only part of the problem. While it makes sense to focus first on Northampton and Holyoke, due to the dense development along the line, rail ties piled along other sections of the route also pose risks to public safety. It is unacceptable that the DOT, according to a statement to the Gazette by spokeswoman Amanda Richard, plans to allow cleanup work to continue for the remainder of the year.

Pan Am Railways for years ignored requests by the city of Holyoke to remove debris considered a fire hazard from several locations in that city. Someone got the company’s attention this past week, though. Steps to start a cleanup in Northampton and Holyoke show that the state, which is overseeing the project, can get the job done if pushed to do the right thing.

More pushing is needed. Kocot is working with the office of U.S. Rep. James McGovern to get the rail company to the table to provide these sorts of answers. State Rep. Stephen Kulik, D-Worthington, says he wants the state fire marshal’s office to attend this meeting as well to, as he said, “bring some extra heft to the conversation and put some pressure on MassDOT to understand the fire hazard situation.” Quick work by lawmakers to address this problem serves people across the region.

Firefighters in Three NH Communities Battled Brush Fires Along Railroad Track

(SOURCE:  Union Leader)


MANCHESTER — Four brush fires along railroad tracks late Wednesday afternoon in Merrimack, Bedford and Manchester remain under investigation, a state forest ranger said.

Ranger Doug Miner of the state Division of Forests and Lands said the first fire was reported in Bedford at 5:06 p.m., followed by a blaze spotted in Merrimack about 5:15 p.m. and then two fires along the tracks in Manchester.

At the time, a Pan Am Railways train, which had 20 cars hauling telephone poles, lumber and other goods, was making its way north on the tracks.

The train stopped behind Northeast Delta Dental Stadium in Manchester to change crews, according to Miner.

A B&M police officer, Miner said, told him the crew reported seeing brush fires along the tracks as it headed north.

Miner said Pan Am sent a mechanic to check the diesel engine and to clean out the smoke stack. When the train was restarted, he said, sparks were emitted.

"It's a little early to make any conclusions," Miner said.

He explained there were many people walking along and across the tracks in Manchester, which is prohibited.

District Fire Chief Al Poulin said there were two brush fires, one near Riverdale Avenue and the other near Gay Street, both along the Merrimack River and the railroad tracks.

About 25 minutes earlier, a brush fire on Railroad Avenue in Merrimack burned about 1½ acres, Poulin said. The fourth fire was in the area of 59 Iron Horse Drive in Bedford.

Less than an acre was burned in the two fires in Manchester, Poulin said.

He said, it took 10 to 15 firefighters to extinguish the blazes. He said drought conditions and heavy snow the past few winters have left woodlands filled with dry bone brush and broken tree limbs.

"What happens, because conditions are so dry, is the fire deep-seeds itself in the underbrush and burns in the ground," he said. The trees are so dry and broken that they easily catch fire.

"The woodlands are basically just a tinderbox, far more than normal," Poulin said.

For safety reasons, the firefighters cut down the trees that were charred and burned and dug up the area of the brush fire because flames are known to hide deep inside the ground.

About 1:45 p.m. firefighters put out a much larger brush fire in the Upland Street area, where several acres burned.

Poulin said investigators determined the fire was caused by a man who was burning personal files in the woods. In that blaze, two forestry units, four-wheel drive vehicles modified with pumps and other firefighting equipment, were brought in along with five other pieces of equipment.

The district chief explained the city's usual fire trucks are too heavy to go into wooded areas. - See more at: http://www.unionleader.com/article/20150528/NEWS07/150529160#sthash.7AGfJtB9.dpuf

MANCHESTER — Four brush fires along railroad tracks late Wednesday afternoon in Merrimack, Bedford and Manchester remain under investigation, a state forest ranger said.

Ranger Doug Miner of the state Division of Forests and Lands said the first fire was reported in Bedford at 5:06 p.m., followed by a blaze spotted in Merrimack about 5:15 p.m. and then two fires along the tracks in Manchester.

At the time, a Pan Am Railways train, which had 20 cars hauling telephone poles, lumber and other goods, was making its way north on the tracks.

The train stopped behind Northeast Delta Dental Stadium in Manchester to change crews, according to Miner.

A B&M police officer, Miner said, told him the crew reported seeing brush fires along the tracks as it headed north.

Miner said Pan Am sent a mechanic to check the diesel engine and to clean out the smoke stack. When the train was restarted, he said, sparks were emitted.

"It's a little early to make any conclusions," Miner said.

He explained there were many people walking along and across the tracks in Manchester, which is prohibited.

District Fire Chief Al Poulin said there were two brush fires, one near Riverdale Avenue and the other near Gay Street, both along the Merrimack River and the railroad tracks.

About 25 minutes earlier, a brush fire on Railroad Avenue in Merrimack burned about 1½ acres, Poulin said. The fourth fire was in the area of 59 Iron Horse Drive in Bedford.

Less than an acre was burned in the two fires in Manchester, Poulin said.

He said, it took 10 to 15 firefighters to extinguish the blazes. He said drought conditions and heavy snow the past few winters have left woodlands filled with dry bone brush and broken tree limbs.

"What happens, because conditions are so dry, is the fire deep-seeds itself in the underbrush and burns in the ground," he said. The trees are so dry and broken that they easily catch fire.

"The woodlands are basically just a tinderbox, far more than normal," Poulin said.

For safety reasons, the firefighters cut down the trees that were charred and burned and dug up the area of the brush fire because flames are known to hide deep inside the ground.

About 1:45 p.m. firefighters put out a much larger brush fire in the Upland Street area, where several acres burned.

Poulin said investigators determined the fire was caused by a man who was burning personal files in the woods. In that blaze, two forestry units, four-wheel drive vehicles modified with pumps and other firefighting equipment, were brought in along with five other pieces of equipment.

The district chief explained the city's usual fire trucks are too heavy to go into wooded areas. - See more at: http://www.unionleader.com/article/20150528/NEWS07/150529160#sthash.7AGfJtB9.dpuf
PAT GROSSMITH
PAT GROSSMITH

Wednesday, April 29, 2015

Proposal For Propane Tanks Sparks Debate in South Portland ME

(SOURCE:  KeepMeCurrent.com, By Kate Irish Collins)

Whether the City Council should take action on a proposed new liquid propane distribution facility before an application for the project has even been officially submitted is at the center of a debate in South Portland.

But other questions surrounding a preliminary plan to allow the NGL Supply Terminals Co. to move from Portland to the Rigby Rail Yard, off Route 1, are being asked, as well, including whether interpretation of the city’s code of ordinances should be left up to residents or paid city staff.

Mayor Linda Cohen told the Current she believes the council should not intervene and that “staff should be allowed to do what they always do – follow their normal procedures” when it comes to determining whether a liquid propane operation at the rail yard adheres to the city’s ordinances.
“At this point, there is not even a complete application before the Planning Board. If and when there is, the public process will begin,” she said.

Councilor Brad Fox disagrees. He said that it’s up to councilors to ensure that the laws of South Portland are followed by elected officials and staff alike. 

“It’s my job as a councilor to ensure the health, safety and general welfare of the people of South Portland (and) I take that responsibility very seriously,” he said. “I think that the people of South Portland expect their elected officials to pay attention to things that may (do) harm and to obey the law.”

Fox has asked the City Council to provide oversight of NGL Supply Terminals Co.’s potential move to South Portland.

As of the Current’s Tuesday deadline, it’s unclear if the company wants to move its operations to the Rigby Yard, which would include construction of six, 60,000-gallon, above-ground tanks to hold liquid propane that would come in by rail and then be transferred to delivery trucks.

The Planning Board held an initial workshop with officials from NGL in late February, and Tex Haeuser, South Portland’s director of planning, said his office has not received anything new from NGL since then.

In addition to the new storage tanks, NGL was also proposing construction of an 1,800-square-foot office building, with associated parking, as well as new security fencing.

NGL has not responded to the Current’s requests for comment, nor have officials with Pan Am Railways, which owns the Rigby Yard.

According to the Maine Historical Society, the Rigby Yard was the base of the Maine Central Railroad, and the location of the interchange with the Boston and Maine line. It was built in 1923 on the site of a former horseracing track and is commonly referred to as the largest rail yard facility in New England.

Questions about whether the NGL proposal meets South Portland’s zoning standards were first raised by resident Eben Rose, who wrote an opinion column in the April 9 issue of the Current in which he argued the plan should have been “dead on arrival.” Instead, he said, NGL was allowed to make its pitch to the Planning Board while Pat Doucette, the city’s code enforcement officer, and Sally Daggett, the city attorney, “deliberately kept” board members in the dark about a city ordinance that prohibits any project that would store gas in excess of 10,000 cubic feet.

But in a memo to City Manager Jim Gailey, dated April 15, Haeuser said he and Doucette both originally felt that the NGL proposal is a permitted use at the Rigby Yard. In the memo, he argued planning staff did not at first think the provision of code cited by Rose applied, since the product being stored would be “primarily in a liquid state.”

However, after further review, which he said was conducted in part because of the questions raised by Rose, Haeuser said planning staff determined in early April that the NGL plan was incomplete and encouraged company officials to consider a variety of alternatives.

Those alternatives, according to Haeuser’s memo, include seeking a zoning amendment or requesting a waiver from the City Council on the current above-ground storage tank capacity rules. He also told Gailey that the planning staff has encouraged Rose to pursue an administrative appeal “as a way to settle the issues being discussed,” which Rose has not yet done.

And, in a memo to Gailey, which is dated March 11, Doucette said she “carefully” considered the city code and initially did not agree with Rose’s interpretation of the law.

But, in his guest column in the Current earlier this month, Rose said one of the reasons he’s been persistent in raising the issue of whether city staff interpreted the code correctly is because “no vision delivered by a Comprehensive Plan or rising through a committee amounts to much if our frontline defenders of the code ignore it.”

Since then, Rose has told the Current that another of his concerns is for the city not to waste staff time and resources “considering prohibited proposals.”

He added that since, in his view, the NGL proposal is actually prohibited by two sections of the code, “they should have been turned away at the door.”

“If NGL wants this project, they first need to try to change these established zoning laws through the council,” Rose said, adding, “the council enacts laws codified in our code of ordinances. It is not staff’s place to invent new code or to make concerted efforts to work around them.”

Like Fox, Rose said his most immediate concern is for health and safety, if the NGL proposal moves forward.

He argued that “even the best adherence to safety codes and inspection still are not 100 percent effective,” and said that even if the risk of a liquid propane spill or explosion is small, it’s still “a risk that does not presently exist.”

Fox said he decided to seek council action after being contacted by Rose and being convinced, after a careful reading, that NGL’s proposed project “is clearly not permitted by two sections of the city code.”

“The language in the code is straightforward. This has been the law in South Portland since 1995,” said Fox. “There is no dispute that liquid natural gas is a petroleum-based product.” 

He added, “Our codes protect our citizens and I want our city staff to follow the code of ordinances as they are written. Twenty years ago, the citizens of this city lobbied the council to limit new tanks for petroleum-based products. The council adopted section 27-1517 and staff is failing to apply it.”

In addition, Fox said, “City staff can’t ignore provisions of the zoning ordinance to the detriment of the public welfare. (That’s why) it is important for the council to provide clear guidance about our expectations.”

Like Rose, Fox said he viewed the workshop and staff time spent on the NGL proposal as a “waste of scarce public resources,” which is why he asked Cohen for the council to step in.

In a recent email to Cohen, he wrote, “I believe councilors should be able to get information about how it happened. I also believe there are times when city councilors must give policy guidance to staff.”

NHDOT to Upgrade Five Portsmouth NH Rail Crossings

(SOURCE:  Seacoastonline.com By Jeff McMenemy)

PORTSMOUTH – The state Department of Transportation is launching a $1 million project to upgrade five railroad crossings in the city.

City officials requested the upgrades in 2014 while Sea-3, a propane storage and distribution facility in Newington, was going through a review process to expand their facility. The Newington Planning Board approved the expansion, but the city appealed the decision to Superior Court. No date has yet been set for that appeal.

Eric Eby, parking and transportation engineer for the city, told members of the Parking and Safety Committee Thursday that the DOT will put out a request for proposals on the project sometime in April.

“The city’s share will be $100,000, or 10 percent for the project,” Eby said at the Thursday morning meeting in City Hall. 

Numerous area officials and residents fought the proposed expansion, citing the substantial increase of propane carrying rail cars that would result from the project, and worries about the condition of Pan Am’s tracks.

The railroad crossings will be upgraded at Barberry Lane, Maplewood Avenue, Green Street, Michael Succi Drive and Gosling Road, Eby said.

After the RFPs are responded to, the DOT will “select a contractor and get working on the project,” Eby said.

Meanwhile, Portsmouth attorney Alec McEachern, who represents Sea-3, recently filed a motion to dismiss the city’s appeals of the facility’s expansion, claiming Portsmouth “lacks standing to appeal the relevant decisions by the town of Newington’s Planning Board,” because the city is not an abutter to the propane facility. McEachern also argues the only impact to Portsmouth of the proposed expansion of Sea-3 is to “increase rail traffic and decrease ship traffic.”

He also filed a motion to intervene in the case, which was filed against the town of Newington. 

Portsmouth staff attorney Jane Ferrini argues in the city’s objection to Sea-3’s motion to dismiss that the court shouldn’t consider the motion because Sea-3 is not yet a party to the appeal. Ferrini argues if the court does allow Sea-3 to intervene “this court may be opening the door for several corporations and associations to request to intervene in the underlying matter, such as … Pan Am, Norfolk Southern Railway and the Propane Gas Association of New England.”

But Ferrini says if the court does allow Sea-3 to intervene, it objects to Sea-3’s motion to dismiss because Portsmouth and three other towns received notice about the proposed expansion after Newington determined the project was a “development of regional interest.”
 Ferrini also contends the city is not “attempting to deprive Sea-3 of its federal” railroad rights, but rather, the city wants a “safety/hazard study of the site and Sea-3’s use of Pan Am railway.”
 
Sea-3 is seeking to build “five additional rail unloading berths and associated handling equipment at its existing” facility, McEachern said in a recent filing with the state’s Site Review Committee. This will allow the company to receive via rail and stockpile excess propane to be used during winter months.

Saturday, March 7, 2015

Fire by Pan Am's Deerfield MA Yard Draws Regional Response

(SOURCE:  MassLive 3/6/15)

DEERFIELD - Firefighters from Franklin and Hampshire Counties and as far away as Brattleboro, Vermont, are on the scene of a Deerfield fire where an industrial building on McClelland Road has been burning for hours.

According to a statement issued by Deerfield Police Chief John Paciorek Jr., the fire was reported at 3:21 a.m. and the first responders to arrive on scene reported a working fire.

According to the emergency services web site Fireground 360, Deerfield firefighters were called to the site of a former grain mill at McClelland Farm Road at about 3 a.m.

Assistance through mutual aid was quickly sought and departments from Amherst, Belchertown, Whately, Montague, Greenfield, Gill, Sunderland, Conway and Brattleboro responded. In all some 20 departments have dispatched assistance.

Paciorek said that in addition, departments from Vermont and southern New Hampshire are assisting.

Tanker trucks are being used to shuttle water to the site, which is just south of Greenfield near Railroad Yard Road.

Paciorek said the property has no water supply and water is being hauled in from Greenfield.

According to WWLP, the fire is contained to the top floor of the four-story metal structure.
Assistant Amherst Fire Chief Donald McCay tells the station that firefighters have concerns that the fire could spread to a smaller building where fertilizer is stored. McCay said the fire is far enough away where that concern in minimized.

Investigators with the state Fire Marshall's Office, the Massachusetts State Police and the Deerfield police are on scene and looking to determine the cause, Paciorek said.

Greenfield police announced that due to the fire, Cheapside Street in Greenfield is closed from from Deerfield Street to Hope Street.

MORE:  Owner of 'Deerfield Innovators Mill': Fire likely caused by cutting torch; not a major setback for planned renovation